WRIT PETITION NO.3013 OF 2018
27 Feb 2019The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by a co-operative housing society, a developer, and its director challenging a stop ...
Search Results for "developer permission"
638 result(s) found
Found 638 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Madras Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Alleged Encroachment on Public Road, Finds Land is Private Property with No Illegal Construction. Commissioner’s Counter Affidavit Establishes That the Disputed Land is Not a Public Street, and Only a Permissible Compound Wall Exists, Leading to Dismissal of Mandamus and Direction to Resolve Civil Disputes in Civil Court.
6 Mar 2025The petitioner, R. Deivayanai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the High Court of Madras seeking a writ of mandamus ...
- 66
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Answers Issues in Suit for Specific Performance and Alternative Reliefs; Vendor Found to Have Breached Obligations by Not Providing Marketable Title and Not Clearing Slum Encumbrance. Illegal Termination of Agreement and Forfeiture of Earnest Declared Invalid as Vendors Failed to Perform Their Reciprocal Covenants Under the Contract.
19 Jul 2010The plaintiff, a developer firm, entered into an agreement for sale with defendants 1 to 5 (vendors) on 1 November 1979 to purchase land with occupant...
- 20
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal of Society Members in Cooperative Redevelopment Dispute. Refusal of Interim Relief by Cooperative Court Not Perverse; Summary Eviction Order Under Section 95A of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 Upheld After Compliance With Natural Justice.
8 Aug 2011The appellants, eight members of Goregaon Unnati Cooperative Housing Society, residing in chawls numbered 19, 20, 21 and 24, filed a dispute before th...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Validity of NOC Requirement from Naval Authorities for Slum Rehabilitation Project. Security Guidelines and Stop Work Notice Challenged as Arbitrary and Without Statutory Backing.
23 Dec 2013The petitioners, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking t...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.
21 Sep 2023The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — Held That Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Civil Suit Is Appropriate Remedy. The court ruled that revenue authorities cannot decide title disputes and writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable for such matters.
23 Jul 2019The petitioners, Mr. Ashok Bansidhar Agarwal and M/s. Rajeshwar Land Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitut...
- 132
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeals, Remands Case for Fresh Assessment, Clarifies Taxability of Unauthorised Structures and Reassessment of Land. Unauthorised Structures Held Liable to Property Tax Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, While Land Already Assessed Cannot Be Reassessed.
5 Nov 2014The four first appeals before the Bombay High Court arose out of orders passed by the Small Causes Court in municipal appeals concerning the fixation ...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project Despite Narrow Road Width, Applies Promissory Estoppel Against Municipal Corporation. MCGM Estopped from Refusing Permission After Granting Initial Approval and Petitioner Acting to His Detriment.
23 Feb 2024The petitioner, Gufran Suleman Qureshi, proprietor of M/s Sirsiwala Realty, sought redevelopment of a building in Mumbai. The Municipal Corporation of...
- 47
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Orders Forensic Audit and Status Quo in Real Estate Project Dispute Over Fund Siphoning Allegations. The Court Approved Forensic Audit Findings That the Amrapali Group Controlled the La-Residentia Project and Diverted Buyer Funds, Leading to Interim Relief for Apartment Buyers Under Writ Petition (Civil) No. 940 of 2017.
29 Jun 2022The Supreme Court of India, in a civil original jurisdiction matter, addressed a dispute concerning the Amrapali La-Residentia real estate project. Th...
- 451
