Search Results for "customs adjudication"

705 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 705 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to COFEPOSA Preventive Detention Powers for Foreign Exchange Violations. Petitioners Contend Absence of Penal Provisions Under FEMA Renders Section 3(1) Unconstitutional.

The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed directly in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3(1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Demand Notices for Lack of Proper Adjudication and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners' Input Tax Credit Reversal and Refund Claims Remanded for Fresh Consideration with Opportunity of Hearing.

The Bombay High Court disposed of three writ petitions filed by Rochem India Pvt. Ltd., Hindustan Construction Company Limited, and JSB Dream Homes Pv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Tribunal Cannot Reduce Mandatory Penalty Under Section 11AC. Assessee Not Entitled to Benefit of Provisos for Payment of Duty and Interest After Show Cause Notice.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Service Tax Amendment on Renting of Immovable Property. The Court upheld the explanation to Section 65(105)(zzc) of the Finance Act, 1994 as clarificatory and not violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, Chanakya Mandal, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Securities Claim on Grounds of Forum Shopping. Petitioners Contend That Regulatory Proceedings Against Clearing Member and Arbitration Against Depository Are Distinct, Allowing Simultaneous Pursuit Under Indemnity Principles.

This matter arises from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Intervention Application in Customs Act Criminal Proceedings. Applicant Sought Clarification of Earlier Judgment to Quash Pending Cases, But Court Held Each Court Must Test Facts for Applicability of Binding Law.

The background of the dispute involved a miscellaneous application filed by Amit Jalan, who was not a party to the original proceedings in Criminal Ap...