Search Results for "corresponding provision"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "corresponding provision"

2121 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2121 result(s)

High Court

Special Court Convicts Broker and Beneficiaries in BMC Bank Securities Fraud; Acquits Employees and Other Brokers. Broker Held Liable for Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Property Under Section 411 IPC, While Beneficiaries Convicted of Cheating Under Section 420 IPC.

18 Jan 2014

The case involved a criminal trial before the Special Court under the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 19...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Kerala Luxury Tax on Tobacco Case to High Court for Determination of Trade Restriction Under Article 301. High Court Must First Find Infringement of Article 301 Before Considering Article 304(b) Saving, Clarifying Kalyani Stores Decision.

30 Jul 1969

The case involved a challenge to the Kerala Luxury Tax on Tobacco (Validation) Act, 1964, enacted after the Supreme Court invalidated earlier rules fo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal and Sets Aside Tribunal's Award in Retrenchment Case – Managerial Decision to Reorganise Business and Retrench Employees Held Bona Fide; Tribunal Cannot Question Propriety. Retrenchment in Compliance with Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25F and West Bengal Industrial Disputes Rules, 1958 Rule 77(1); Error of Tribunal in Ignoring Bona Fide Nature of Decision Corrected via Certiorari.

27 Nov 1968

The dispute arose from the retrenchment of employees by Parry & Co. Ltd. following a policy decision to reorganise its business by emphasising manufac...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

1 Jan 1970

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...

High Court

NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018

27 Feb 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Common Question of Law in Consolidated Commercial Suits and Interim Applications. The Court Interprets Provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 in the Context of Multiple Suits Involving Banking, Media, and Other Commercial Disputes.

27 Feb 2019

...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 295 Amendment and Demand for Unearned Income Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The Lead Petition Involved Assignment of Leasehold Rights and a Demand of Over Rs. 94 Crores, With the Petitioners Alleging the Retrospective Amendment Violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).

3 May 2018

The judgment pertained to a batch of four writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Ordinary O...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2016

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

32 33 34 35 36

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)