Search Results for "certificate does not confer title"

479 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 479 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Disposes of Two Public Interest Litigations Challenging Joint Venture Agreement for Transfer of 20 Acres of Land at Film City, Goregaon. The Court Decided the Common Challenge to the Agreement in Both Petitions, Leaving Other Reliefs for Separate Adjudication.

The High Court of Bombay heard two public interest litigations filed by different sets of petitioners, both challenging the actions of the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree Declaring Plaintiffs' Ownership of 3/4th Share in Suit Property. Agreements Executed by Co-Owners Held Not Binding on Plaintiffs' Undivided Share Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 21 August 2003 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, in Special Civil Suit No.2107 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree of Specific Performance and Mesne Profits. Notarized but Unregistered Agreement to Sell Held Void Under Registration Act, 1908.

The present appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the judgment and decree dated 08.05.2024 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in RERA Delayed Possession Case, Upholds Allottees' Right to Interest. Section 18 of RERA Overrides Section 55 of Contract Act; Acceptance of Delayed Possession Does Not Waive Right to Compensation.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against the judgment of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Suit for Compensation and Declaration of Sale Agreement as Void. Amendment Sought to Challenge Agreement for Sale of Property Allegedly Purchased with Siphoned Funds Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

The Plaintiff, Edit II Productions, filed a suit seeking compensation for financial loss caused by the Defendants who allegedly siphoned funds from th...