Search Results for "beneficiary company"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Reviews High Court Decision Setting Aside Decree for Partition, Fo...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...

Search Results for "beneficiary company"

490 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 490 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Quash Discharge Rejection in Corruption Case — Applicant, a Retired Superintending Engineer, Cannot Claim Discharge Merely Because Main Accused Was Discharged. The Court Held That at the Stage of Discharge, the Court Must Consider Whether the Allegations, if Accepted, Constitute an Offence, and the Material on Record Prima Facie Shows the Applicant's Involvement.

2 Sep 2025

The applicant, Sanjay Laxman Kholapurkar, a retired Superintending Engineer, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 10533 OF 2023

2 May 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows GST Refund Claim for Export of Services, Holds That Unjust Enrichment Provisions Do Not Apply When Tax Incidence Is Not Passed On to Any Person in India. The Court interpreted Section 54(8)(d) of CGST Act, 2017 and held that in case of export of services, the foreign client is not a 'person' for the purpose of unjust enrichment, and the refund cannot be rejected on that ground.

9 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Jar Productions Private Limited, is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, engaged in providing production services to ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Gujarat Sales Tax Act Case Due to No Breach of Exemption Conditions and Application of Promissory Estoppel. The assessee was entitled to exemption under Entry No.255(2) of Notification dated 05.03.1992 as raw materials were used in the eligible unit, and subsequent amendments did not retroactively impose liabilities, upholding the principle of promissory estoppel under Section 49(2) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969.

21 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from the State of Gujarat's appeal against the High Court's dismissal of its tax appeals, which upheld the Gujarat Value Added Tax T...

High Court

KAHC010525052012_1

23 Aug 2021

The litigation originated from a suit for partition and declaration filed by the plaintiff, D. Sujatha, against the legal representatives of the origi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.

6 Nov 2020

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Re-Hearing in PIL on Park Land Encroachment Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Undertakings Recorded for Park Development and Slum Rehabilitation Under Karnataka Slum Areas Act; Review Petitions Allowed, Matter Restored for Fresh Adjudication.

21 Dec 2018

The petitioner, a federation of residents' welfare associations, filed a public interest litigation in 2006 alleging encroachment on approximately 3 a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy

25 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 7 Application for CIRP — Claimants Failed to Prove Debt and Default. The Tribunal held that the Appellants did not establish the existence of a financial debt or default, and the application was barred by limitation.

30 Nov -0001

The present appeal was filed by Vistra ITCL (India) Limited, Pratiti Trading Private Limited, and Gajendra Investment Limited (Appellants) against the...

32 33 34 35 36

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)