Search Results for "basic requirements"

2169 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2169 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Land Acquisition Notification for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Act. Land Owner's Property Acquired Without Proper Application by SRA and Without Opportunity of Hearing.

The petitioner, Deena Pramod Baldota, is the owner of land bearing CTS No.355 (part) and other sub-numbers admeasuring about 5115.2 sq. meters situate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge Against Arbitral Order Granting Opportunity to Cure Resolution Irregularity. Order held not an interim award under Section 2(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as it does not finally determine any issue.

The judgment concerns two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Petitioners (RA Group) challenging an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Dispute Due to Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. The award was based on no evidence and misreading of the agreement, ignoring letters that modified the restriction on telecast rights.

The petitioner, Radha Krshna Films Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 05/01/2007 passed by the Joint Tribunal of the Film Makers Combine (FMC) a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summons for Judgment in Summary Suit for Recovery of Project Management Fees. Agreement for Development of Property by Family Members Not a Commercial Transaction Entitling Summary Procedure Under Order 37 CPC.

The plaintiff, Satchi Development Company Pvt. Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for recovery of ₹3,70...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summons for Judgment in Summary Suit for Recovery of Project Expenses Due to Triable Issues. Agreement for Project Management and Development between Family Members Raises Questions of Authority, Consideration, and Entitlement to Reimbursement.

The plaintiff, Satchi Development Company Pvt. Ltd., filed a summary suit for recovery of Rs. 3,70,20,410 with future interest against defendant No.1,...