Search Results for "Section 100 Companies Act 2013"

921 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 921 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Issues Show Cause Notice and Considers Contempt Action Against Insolvent for Undisclosed Bank Transactions Under Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909. Allegations of Non-Disclosure of Bank Accounts and Transactions Post-Adjudication Examined Under Section 33(4) of the Act.

The matter arises from insolvency proceedings against Pallav Sheth, who was notified under Section 3(2) of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment based on mere change of opinion on share premium addition under Section 68 is invalid as all material was disclosed during original assessment.

The petitioner, Rajshree Realtors Private Limited, a real estate company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012-2013 declaring income of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeal in Summary Suit Under Commercial Courts Act — Order on Summons for Judgment Challenged as 'Judgment' Under Section 13(1A). Transitional Provisions and Assignment Orders Examined for Pending Suits Transferred to Commercial Division.

The Commercial Appeal arose from an order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Commercial Division of the Bombay High Court in Summons for Judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge Against Arbitral Order Granting Opportunity to Cure Resolution Irregularity. Order held not an interim award under Section 2(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as it does not finally determine any issue.

The judgment concerns two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Petitioners (RA Group) challenging an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Validity of Proviso to Section 115JB(6) of Income Tax Act in SEZ Cases. The court held that the proviso inserted by Finance Act, 2011 is not ultra vires the SEZ Act and is valid and enforceable.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by companies operating in Special Economic Zones (SEZs) challenging the constitutional validity of t...