Search Results for "Railway service"

1543 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1543 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute. Termination of Services Agreement by State Assembly Secretariat Held Illegal by Arbitrator; Court's Decision on Frustration and Party Distinctness Not Available in Provided Excerpt.

Background: The dispute arose from an agreement dated 5 December 2015 between the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly (UPLA) Secretariat and Tata Consu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal of Injured Police Sub-Inspector Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. Loss of Earning Capacity Established Despite Continuation in Service with Reduced Duties and Loss of Promotional Opportunities.

The appellant, Vipinbhai Rayjibhai Bhill, was a Sub-Inspector at the Railway Police Station, Dabhoi, serving under the Gujarat Police. On 10.05.2011, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State Government Jurisdiction in Gratuity Claims. Establishment Not Under Central Control or Having Multi-State Branches Falls Under State Government Under Section 2(a) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

The dispute in this case centered on whether the appropriate Government for the Petitioner, M/s. Rhone Poulene (India) Ltd., under the Payment of Grat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Judgment Debtor’s Liability to Pay Interest Clarified: Deposit in Appellate Court Does Not Cease Accrual of Interest" "Bombay High Court reiterates the conditions for cessation of interest under Order XXI, Rule 1 of CPC."

This case examines the cessation of interest on a decretal amount deposited by the judgment debtor in an appellate court, rather than the executing co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Land Dispute Case — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Non-Application of Mind by First Appellate Court. The Court Held That the First Appellate Court Must Comply with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC and Decide the Appeal on Merits After Proper Appreciation of Evidence.

The present second appeals arise from a land dispute between the appellants (original plaintiffs) and the respondents (original defendants) concerning...