Search Results for "Omissions and Contradictions"

971 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 971 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Considers Appeals Against Conviction Under Section 302 Read with 34 IPC. The Appeals Challenge Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence, Including Decomposed Body Identification and Extra-Judicial Confession.

The appeals arose from a conviction by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 246 of 1997, where the accused were found ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shankar Balwant Malvankar, was a clerk/beat inspector with the Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation. He was convicted by the Special Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cross-Cases of Land Dispute Violence — Benefit of Doubt Given Due to Inconsistent and Interested Testimony. Conviction under Sections 326, 324, 323, 504, 114 IPC and Section 3(1)(10) SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of the respondents-accused in two interconnected cross-cases arising from a land dispute. The inci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302 and 326 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from an incident on 4 April 2013 in village Nipani Jawalka, where the deceased Mahadeo was allegedly assaulted by the appellants. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused in Murder Case Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony — Knife Blows Inflicted on Deceased Near Hospital Gate Established Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Rohtas and Surender Singh, upholding their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder and Rioting in Land Dispute Case. Appellant Jayawant convicted under Section 302 IPC for causing death by axe blow during a group attack over election rivalry.

The case arises from an incident on 18 December 1986 at 2:30 p.m. in a field called 'Shericha Mala' in Village Nazare Supe, owned by the deceased Baji...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The present appeal was filed by original accused Nos.1 and 2, Manohar and Uttam Sadavarte, challenging their conviction by the learned Additional Sess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Wrongful Confinement Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366 and 342 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Obalesha @ Ranga, was convicted by the Fast Track Sessions Court-XVI, Bangalore City, in S.C.No.305/2011 for offences under Sections 36...