Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act"

554 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 554 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petition Due to Non-Application of Correct Market Value. Petitioner's Land Acquired in 2008 for Satara Municipal Council, Court Directs Recalculation Based on Comparable Sale Instances Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Zal Sam Cooper, owned land in Satara that was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the Satara Municipal Council under the Land Acq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Lapse of Proceedings Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Pass Award Within Two Years of Section 6 Declaration Results in Acquisition Lapsing and Entitlement to Restoration of Possession.

The petitioner, Zal Sam Cooper, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the acq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Condition No. 5 of NOCs for Redevelopment Projects — Condition Imposing Payment of Expenditure Incurred by Board Held Unauthorized and Without Legal Basis. Court directs refund of amounts paid under protest pursuant to the impugned condition.

The Petitioner, Chandulal Jorawarmal Mehta, a sole proprietor of Mehta Developers, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Municipal Corporation for Non-Compliance of Land Acquisition Order. Conditional Order Does Not Amount to Willful Disobedience Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s. Chinchwad Devasthan Trust, a public religious trust, owned land admeasuring about 1,05,400 sq.m at Bhosari within the jurisdictio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Development Rights Certificate for Recreation Ground Amenity Under Regulation 34 of DCR 1991. Owner entitled to TDR for construction upon developing and handing over reserved amenity free of cost.

The petitioners, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a wri...