Search Results for "Intimidation charge"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Intimidation charge"

583 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 583 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in SC/ST Atrocity Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public View. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

1 Mar 2021

The appellants, Nagnath Rama Arjun, Maruti Yeshwant Mohite, and Dayaram Bhagwan Koli, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Solapur, in Special Case N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Kidnapping of Minor Girl — Evidence of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical and Circumstantial Evidence. The conviction under Sections 366, 376(1)(f), 354, and 506(II) IPC was sustained as the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.

8 Jan 2010

The appellant, Ganpat son of Sadashiv Nadekar, was convicted by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge-4, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 299 of 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against NMMC Officers in SC/ST Act Case — No Prima Facie Case as Alleged Insult Occurred in Private Meeting, Not in Public View. Requirement of 'Public View' Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act Not Satisfied When Incident Takes Place in Closed Chamber Without Public Presence.

22 Jul 2010

The petitioners, five senior officers of the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution rea...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Simple Hurt in Rape Case Acquittal Appeal — Appellants Acquitted of Rape but Convicted Under Section 323 IPC for Assaulting Prosecutrix.

30 Nov 2010

The appellants, Sonu Babu Pival and Kanta Sonu Pival, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Pune on 14.8.1996 in Sessions Case No.379 of 1995. They we...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in MCOCA Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364A IPC and MCOCA set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the victim was kidnapped for ransom.

6 May 2016

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Special Judge under MCOC Case No. 15 of 2005 for offences under Section 364A, 365,...

High Court

High Court Quashes FIR in Criminal Petitions Under BNSS, 2023 Due to False Allegations of Physical Relationship on Pretext of Marriage. Petitioners Acquitted as Proceedings Deemed Abuse of Process

19 Jan 2026

The High Court of Karnataka heard two criminal petitions filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking to quash a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs in Multiple Cheque Bounce Cases Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Litigation Mediation Under Section 148 of NI Act. Court holds that failure to refer disputes to mediation before taking cognizance renders criminal proceedings invalid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court dealt with multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Atrocity Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction under Sections 332, 504, 506(2) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Voluntarily Causing Hurt to Deter Public Servant from Duty.

6 Feb 2026

The appellant, Jadeja Mahipatsinh Dhulaji, was convicted by the learned Special Judge, Joint District Court, Patan on 01.04.2005 in Special Atrocity C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Forum for Trial in SEBI Act Cases — Retrospective Application of 2002 and 2014 Amendments Disputed. Court Considers Whether Change from Magistrate to Sessions Court and Subsequent Special Courts Affects Pre‑2002 Offences Still Pending.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of appeals and petitions before the Supreme Court concerned the proper forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange Board ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Regulatory Appeal on Trial Forum under Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Procedural Amendment to Section 26 by the 2002 Amendment Act Held Retrospective, and All Pending Trials for Pre-2002 Offences Must Proceed Before Special Court as per the 2014 Amendment.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals and writ petitions concerning the correct forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange...

32 33 34 35 36

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)