Search Results for "Interest Act, 1978"

1865 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1865 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.6789 OF 2016

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Oral Agreement for Sale of Basement Premises. Agreement Not Proved and Relief Barred by Limitation and Doctrine of Part Performance.

The plaintiffs, a partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement dated 30.11.1977 for the purchase of a basement-cum-god...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010525052012_1

The litigation originated from a suit for partition and declaration filed by the plaintiff, D. Sujatha, against the legal representatives of the origi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Central Excise Notification on Tobacco Products. Challenge to Notification No.3/2019 under Central Excise Act, 1944 Alleged Violation of Constitutional and Statutory Provisions.

A batch of writ petitions was filed by several manufacturers of tobacco and tobacco products under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Payment of Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Interest Act, 1978 and Article 226 of Constitution Invoked to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice.

The petitioner, Mrs. Prabhavati Ramgarib B., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Central...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Remand Order in Dispute Over Dissolution of Partnership and Final Decree. Partnership dissolution, settlement of accounts, and profit-sharing dispute resolved through remand for evidentiary re-evaluation.

The Supreme Court disposed of appeals challenging the High Court's remand order concerning the dissolution of the partnership firm Crystal Transport S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Hawking Activities on Footpaths in Nariman Point and Churchgate Areas. Court Holds That Hawking Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(g) Subject to Reasonable Restrictions, and That Municipal Authorities Have Discretion to Designate Hawking Zones.

The petitioners, a group of residents and welfare associations from Nariman Point and Churchgate areas in Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (...