Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1610 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1610 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cenvat Credit on Input Services for Sugar Manufacturing Upheld. Transportation of Sugarcane from Farm to Factory Gate Held as Input Service Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

The Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs, Belgaum) appealed against the Final Order No.20105/2014 dated 28.1.2014 passed by the CESTAT, Ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Adjudication Orders for Breach of Natural Justice. Non-Compliance with Tribunal's Remand Directions on Disclosure of Test Reports Amounts to Denial of Fair Hearing Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The writ petition under Article 226 arose from a dispute over the classification of a product known as 'CHOCOS' manufactured by Kellogg India Private ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Excise Case — Petitioner Not Required for Custodial Investigation. Offences under Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 are not punishable with death or life imprisonment, and no criminal antecedents reported.

The petitioner, Nagaraja, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking anticipatory bail in t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Refund Claim Under Customs Act Requires Appeal Against Assessment Order. Self-Assessment Under Section 17 and Amendment to Section 27 by Finance Act 2011 Examined.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by assessees and the Union of India against judgments of various High Courts and the Customs, Excise ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Interest on Customs Refund. Petitioner entitled to interest under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 from the date of expiry of three months from the date of receipt of the refund order.

The Petitioner, Shelf Drilling International Inc. (formerly Sedco Forex International Drilling Inc.), filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Central Excise Duty Demand and Penalty. Petitioner failed to show any jurisdictional error or perversity in concurrent findings of fact regarding duty demand and penalty under Central Excise Rules.

The petitioner, M/s. Mandovi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at ...