Search Results for "Common Purpose"

8398 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8398 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Appeals Against Company Law Board's Investigation Order Under Section 237(b)(i) of Companies Act, 1956. Appeals challenge the order directing investigation into the affairs of companies allegedly linked to Ketan Parekh in the 2001 stock scam.

The judgment pertains to 14 appeals filed by various companies alleged to be controlled by Ketan Parekh, the central figure in the 2001 stock market s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Cadila Pharmaceuticals in Passing Off Action by Medley Laboratories. Marks 'HB TONE' and 'RB TONE' Held Deceptively Similar for Pharmaceutical Products, Injunction Confirmed.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the appellant (original defendant) for infringement and passing o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Burden of Proof Not Discharged. Appellant failed to prove inadequacy of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as evidence of comparable sales was not properly established.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Benjamin Pereira against the judgment and award dated 17th November 2006 passed by the Learned District Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Revision Against SEBI Special Court's Rejection of Discharge in SEBI Prosecution for Non-Payment of Penalty. Vicarious Liability of Directors Under Section 27 SEBI Act Questioned Due to Absence of Specific Averments in Complaint.

The matter arose from four Criminal Revision Applications filed before the High Court of Bombay challenging a common order of the SEBI Special Court t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Applications in International Commercial Arbitration — Habitual Residence Determined at Time of Agreement. Applicant Residing in UAE at Time of Agreement Held to be Habitually Resident Outside India Under Section 2(1)(f)(i) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns three arbitration applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Aslam Ismail Khan Deshmu...