Search Results for "Acquittal"

7022 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7022 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to a corruption trap laid by the Anti Corruption Bureau, Beed, against Rajendra Dhondiba Jogdand (accused no.1), an Agricultural Off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry and Absence of Proximate Cause. Conviction under Sections 498A, 304B, 306 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Cruelty or Abetment to Suicide.

The appellant, Kamlesh Satyaprakash Agarwal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 498A, 304B, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Madhav Bhalchandra Rajurkar, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, for demanding and accepti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in House Trespass Case Due to Unreliable Sole Witness. Conviction under Section 452 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and the prosecution failed to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dinesh Chandrikaprasad Phatak, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar under Section 452 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Cruelty and Unnatural Sex Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegations Under Sections 498A and 377 IPC Fail as Complainant's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Unnatural Sex.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 17/6/1999 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 26th Court, Borivali, Mumbai, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The appellant, Madhu @ Madhav Nivruti Pawar, was convicted by the 7th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai at Sewree in Sessions Case No.4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances and recovery of weapon was doubtful.

The appellant, Arjun Puna Soni, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Nagendra Singh, a carpenter, and sentenced ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Gorakh Pandurang Jedhe, a clerk in the Irrigation Department, who was charged under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish the presence of all accused at the scene and the common intention to cause death.

The judgment arises from three appeals against a common judgment and order dated 14.2.2008 of the learned Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, in Sessions Case...