Search Results for "trial necessary"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "trial necessary"

13512 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13512 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal by Bank Manager Convicted of Forgery and Corruption. Court Examines Prosecution Evidence and Notes Adverse Inference Under Section 114(g) of Evidence Act for Non-Examination of Material Witnesses.

21 Apr 2016

The appeal arose from the judgment of the Special Judge for CBI cases convicting the appellant, a former branch manager of Syndicate Bank, for offence...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Witnesses in Murder Trial Under Section 311 CrPC When Legal Aid Counsel Failed to Adequately Cross-Examine Due to Lack of Instructions from Accused in Custody. The court set aside the Sessions Judge's order rejecting recall and permitted recall subject to payment of costs.

25 Jan 2021

The applicant, Jaideo s/o Jagdish Sajjal, was an accused in Sessions Trial 42 of 2020 before the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, charged with murdering hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Plaint Rejection Upheld for Lack of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Dispute over mortgaged properties held to be exclusively triable by DRT under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

4 Sep 2023

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi and Vandana (plaintiffs) against the Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operativ...

High Court

NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018

27 Feb 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Common Question of Law in Consolidated Commercial Suits and Interim Applications. The Court Interprets Provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 in the Context of Multiple Suits Involving Banking, Media, and Other Commercial Disputes.

27 Feb 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Arbitration Reference and Anti-Suit Injunction in Wind Turbine Technology Licensing Dispute. The Core Issue Revolves Around Whether an Unincorporated IPLA Constitutes a Binding Arbitration Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Oct 2012

The dispute arose from a joint venture between Enercon (India) Ltd. and its directors (Petitioners) and Enercon GmbH and Wobben Properties GmbH (Respo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Holding That Bail in Original FIR Does Not Cover Newly Added UAPA Offences and NIA Re-Registration Is Not a Second FIR. The court ruled that the appellant must seek fresh bail for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, and that the NIA's re-registration and further investigation were lawful.

26 Apr 2019

The appellant, Pradeep Ram, was initially arrested in connection with FIR No. 02/2016 registered at Police Station Tandwa for offences under Sections ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Additional Evidence in NI Act Case — Settlement Agreement After Trial Held Relevant. The appellate court must consider subsequent events that affect the merits of the case under Section 391 CrPC, even if the evidence could have been produced earlier with due diligence.

22 Nov 2019

The applicant, Ranjan Dutta, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pune, f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arrest Under PML Act — Validity of Arrest Under Section 19 PML Act Must Be Examined by Trial Court at Remand Stage

12 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) under Section 19 of the Prevention...

High Court

High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 376(2)(f) of IPC. Appellant Contends That Evidence Only Proves Attempt to Rape, Not Penetration, Challenging Conviction for Rape of a Minor Below 12 Years.

21 Sep 2006

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant for the rape of a ten-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code. On Novembe...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)