WRIT PETITION NO. 73 OF 2015
3 May 2019...
Search Results for "take notice"
16743 result(s) found
Found 16743 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Freezing of Demat Accounts of Promoter for Non-Compliant Company Under SEBI Circulars — Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Freezing of all securities held by a promoter in a non-compliant company, including unrelated investments, without notice or hearing is arbitrary and illegal under Article 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution.
26 Aug 2024The Bombay High Court allowed two writ petitions filed by Dr. Pradeep Mehta and his son Neil Pradeep Mehta challenging the freezing of their demat acc...
- 423
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Assessment Orders Issued in Trade Name Despite Proprietor's Participation — Estoppel by Conduct Bars Challenge to Notice. The Court held that assessment orders are not non-est merely because notices were issued in the trade name, as the proprietor participated in proceedings without objection.
15 Mar 2016The case involves multiple sales tax references filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax against M/s. Klip Nail Care and other respondents. The common q...
- 129
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Banks' Appeals in RBI Fraud Classification Case Regarding Natural Justice Requirements. Court Holds No Absolute Right to Personal Hearing or Full Forensic Audit Report Disclosure Under RBI Master Directions Issued Under Section 35A Banking Regulation Act, 1949.
7 Apr 2026The dispute arose from the classification of loan accounts as 'fraud' by banks under the Reserve Bank of India's Master Directions. The appellant bank...
- 867
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Blacklisting Order in Contract Termination Case — Lack of Specific Notice Violates Natural Justice. Blacklisting Without Mention in Show Cause Notice Is Impermissible and Without Jurisdiction Under Principles of Natural Justice.
16 Nov 2020The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by UMC Technologies Private Limited against the order of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, which had upheld...
- 440
High Court
Karnataka High Court Delivers Order on Writ Petitions Challenging DGFT Policy Circulars on SEIS Eligibility and Show Cause Notices. The Court Addresses the Ultra Vires Nature of Circulars No. 06/2018 and 08/2018 under Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020.
25 Apr 2024Two writ petitions were filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging the validity of Policy Circulars No. 06/2018 dated 22.05.2018 and No. 08/201...
- 33
High Court
High Court of Bombay Disposes of Notice of Motion in Flat Allotment Dispute — Consideration of Interim Relief for Appointment of Receiver and Injunction Sought by Original Allottee’s Transferee. The court examines validity of termination of allotment by builder where original allottee alleged fraud in transfer, and subsequent sales to third parties.
4 Jun 2014The present dispute arose out of a flat in the Oberoi Splendor project at Andheri, Mumbai. The plaintiff, a practising advocate, filed a suit seeking ...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Contract by Food Corporation of India Due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Non-Submission of Bank Guarantee Within Stipulated Period Held to be Force Majeure, and Debarment Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice.
5 Apr 2022The petitioner, M/s. Gupta Freight Carrier, a proprietorship firm, was awarded a contract by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) on 20.03.2020 for tra...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeals in Encroachment Dispute, Holding Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction. Shopkeepers' Suits for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Property Vested in Corporation Under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.
30 Nov -0001The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and its Assistant Municipal Commissioner filed appeals against an interim order passed by the City Civil C...
- 141
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in Capital Gains Tax Case — Transfer of Shares by Non-Resident Not Taxable as No Capital Asset in India. Shares of a foreign company held not to be a capital asset situated in India under Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and transfer not taxable under Section 9(1)(i) as income deemed to accrue or arise in India.
18 Mar 2016The Petitioner, Techpac Holdings Ltd., a company incorporated in Bermuda and a non-resident, challenged an Assessment Order dated 25th March 2013 pass...
- 138
