Search Results for "stick blow"

350 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 350 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder in Unlawful Assembly Case — Conviction Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Appellant's Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Read with Section 149 IPC Sustained as Part of Unlawful Assembly with Common Object to Kill.

The appellant, Santosh Kantilal Kharva, was convicted by the Special Judge (CBI), Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No. 666 of 2011 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jaikisan s/o Kashinath Dhamdhere, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule in Sessions Case No. 191 of 2014 for offences p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 427, 435, 452 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 302, 427, 435, 452 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellants were...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for causing death by strangulation set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nandakumar @ Chhotu Vasudev Samant, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai for the murder of his wife Suchitra under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly Not Proved and Doubtful Identification. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove common object under Section 149 IPC and identification of accused was unreliable, leading to acquittal.

The case involves an appeal by five appellants against their conviction by the Sessions Judge, Amravati, for offences including murder under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Seven-Year Sentence for Attempt to Murder by Firearm. High Court's Reduction of Sentence Set Aside as Injuries Were Life-Threatening and Commensurate Punishment Required.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad which reduced the sentence of imprisonment for the accused in a case of attemp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 452, 342 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Akram Khalil Ahmed Inamdar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of Farukh Shaikh under Sections 302,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 452, 342 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Akram Khalil Ahmed Inamdar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of Farukh Shaikh under Sections 302,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for causing burn injuries to victim set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence.

The appellant, Sou Kamal Raju Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for the murder of her sister-in-law, Lata, under Section 30...