Writ Petition No. 3410 of 2004
6 Oct 2017The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two writ petitions together. The petitioners, former Branch Manager and Accountant of ...
Search Results for "single transaction rule"
1678 result(s) found
Found 1678 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.
13 Nov 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...
- 924
High Court
High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in GST Case on Assignment of Leasehold Rights - Assignment of Long-Term Leasehold Rights Held as Transfer of Immovable Property, Not Supply of Service Under Section 7 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Rendering GST Liability Inapplicable.
23 Jan 2026The dispute arose from a show cause notice issued under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, to the petitioner, a company that ...
- 543
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Parallel Litigation Case — Abuse of Process of Law. Filing of Two Parallel Proceedings in Respect of Same Transaction Before Two Different Forums Constitutes Abuse of Process of Law Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
1 Feb 2019The petitioner, Mr. Hiremani Kallappa Melage, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of t...
- 115
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rent Authority Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Failure to Consider Tenant's Objections and Violation of Natural Justice. The Court set aside the Competent Authority's order under Section 25(2) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, as the tenant was not heard and the order was passed without jurisdiction.
3 Sep 2025The petitioner, a tenant in a building owned by respondent No.3, challenged an order dated 30 July 2024 passed by the Competent Authority (Rent Act) u...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell for Shop Premises Enforced as Plaintiff Proved Continuous Readiness and Defendants Failed to Execute Sale Deed Despite Receiving Earnest Money.
2 Sep 2015The respondent (original plaintiff) filed Special Civil Suit No.136 of 1987 for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 19.7.1987, whereby ...
- 106
High Court
High Court of Madras Hears Appeal Against Trial Court's Partial Decree in Specific Performance Suit. Trial Court Dismissed Specific Performance Citing Public Policy and Fabricated Receipts, Ordered Refund of Rs.2,00,000.
10 Apr 2026The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of two sale agreements dated January 6, 2003, one registered and one unregistered, executed by ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Concurrent Running of Sentences for Convict in Three Wildlife and Forest Offence Cases Under Section 427 CrPC. Court exercises discretion to direct concurrent sentences for a poor farmer convicted in three separate cases under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and Indian Forest Act, 1927.
4 Jan 2021The petitioner, Kuttu @ Rahul Chhahalal Pardhi, a convict undergoing imprisonment in three different crimes, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Conviction for Possession of Heroin Set Aside as Search and Seizure Conducted Without Proper Authorization and Without Informing Appellant of Right to be Searched Before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate.
6 Nov 2020The appellant, Musa Abdul Wimumuni Kenneth, a Nigerian national, was convicted by the Special Judge under the NDPS Act, 1985 in Special Case No. 140 o...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Mutation Entry for Land Purchased from Public Trust. Mutation entry No.8930 restored as Assistant Collector lacked jurisdiction to cancel it without notice and without challenging the sale deed.
19 Jan 2010The petitioners, Digambar Hiraman Saraf and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging an order dated 24.12.1990...
- 73
