Search Results for "sexual intercourse"

879 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 879 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(1), 341, 506, 109 IPC and Sections 4, 12, 17 POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellants, Kisan Damaji Naik and Ramesh Abidas Vasave, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nandurbar, in Sessions Case No. 01/2018 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal Dismissed: Court Upholds 10-Year Imprisonment for Sexual Assault of a Minor. The Bombay High Court affirms the conviction under IPC and POCSO Act, dismissing the appellant's claims of false implication and procedural lapses.

The Bombay High Court dismissed an appeal challenging a 10-year rigorous imprisonment sentence handed down by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age of Victim. Birth Certificate with overwriting and lack of ossification test render age of victim unproven, vitiating conviction under Sections 376(2)(i),(n) IPC, Goa Children's Act, and POCSO Act.

The appellant, Santosh Gore, was convicted by the Children's Court for the State of Goa in Special Case No.36/2017 for offences under Section 376(2)(i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Cancellation of Bail in POCSO Case for Misuse of Liberty. Petitioner's bail cancelled under Section 439(2) CrPC for threatening victim and tampering with evidence, violating bail conditions under POCSO Act and IPC.

The petitioner, accused No.2 in Crime No.146/2023, was charged with offences under Sections 363, 376(2)(n), 506 IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony. Trial Court's Use of Vulgar Language in Recording Testimony Strongly Deprecated.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment dated 14/08/2012 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, in Sessions Case No.19 of 2010, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Reconsiders Appellant’s Murder Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence; Handwriting Expert Opinion Under Scrutiny. Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Challenged on Grounds That Chain of Circumstances Incomplete and Expert Evidence Not Corroborated.

The appellant, Vikas Ramdas Khairnar Patil, preferred a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against his conviction and life imprisonment for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Eknath Pandurang Koli, was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Amalner, in Special Case No. 26 of 2014 for offences under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Siddharth @ Bollywood S/o Bapurao Meshram, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for offences under Section 376(2)(i) IPC, Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Conviction under Sections 3(a), 5(j)(ii), 5(l) of POCSO Act and Sections 376, 417 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's age not proven beyond reasonable doubt and relationship was consensual.

The appellant, Kundan Pendor, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 3(a), 5(j)(ii), and 5(l) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...