Search Results for "section 376"

1810 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1810 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Proceedings in Kidnapping and Rape Case Involving Minor Wife. Exception to Rape Under Section 375 IPC and Inapplicability of POCSO Act to Married Minor Held to Justify Quashing.

The Bombay High Court allowed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash an FIR and the consequent tria...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Unexplained Delay. Conviction under Sections 376(1), 376(2)(l) IPC and Sections 4, 6, 10 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rajesh Murlidhar Lonbale, was convicted by the Special Judge under Sections 376(1), 376(2)(l) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Set-off of Pre-conviction Detention Under Section 428 Cr.P.C. in Rape Conviction Case. Court Directs Jail Authorities to Recalculate Sentence by Setting Off Period of Incarceration Prior to Conviction Against Substantive Sentence of Imprisonment.

The petitioner, Tenzin @ Elin Dorje, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panaji, in Sessions Case No. 23/2016 for offences under Sections ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child below 18 years.

The appellant, Mahesh S/o Kundlik Dhavare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad in Special (POCSO) Case No.26 of 2015 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Mentally Challenged Woman Under Section 376(2)(l) IPC. Evidence of Victim's Mental Condition and Consistent Testimony of Witnesses Sufficient to Prove Forcible Sexual Intercourse.

The appellant, Raju Jaishriram Telgote, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot in Sessions Case No. 64/2015 for offences under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape and SC/ST Act Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Evidence of Prosecutrix Found Unreliable and Contradictory, Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape Allegation.

The State of Karnataka, through the Assistant Superintendent of Police, Puttur, appealed against the judgment of acquittal dated 08.10.2015 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was unreliable and medical evidence did not support the allegations.

The appellant, Narayana Swamy, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapura (sitting at Chintamani) in Spl.S.C.No.3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(1), 341, 506, 109 IPC and Sections 4, 12, 17 POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellants, Kisan Damaji Naik and Ramesh Abidas Vasave, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nandurbar, in Sessions Case No. 01/2018 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against High Court Order Setting Aside Rejection of Discharge in Gang Rape Case. High Court Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence at Pre-Charge Stage Under Section 227 CrPC.

The present appeals were preferred by the State of West Bengal against the impugned judgment and order dated 06.05.2022 passed by the High Court at Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim Was Below 18 Years.

The appellant, Kawadu Madhukar Atram, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Special (POCSO) Case 70 of 2016 ...