Search Results for "section 185"

847 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 847 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Triple Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence and Motive Establish Guilt. Accused Raju Birha Convicted Under Section 302 IPC for Murder of Three Persons, Death Penalty Upheld as Rarest of Rare Case.

The case pertains to the conviction of Raju Birha for the murder of three persons, Sunil Kotangale, Kailash Bahadure, and Golu @ Ashish Gaikwad, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Matter Finally in Writ Petition Challenging MSEDCL Communication. The Court Decides the Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution with Consent of Parties After Respondents Waive Service.

The petitioners, a private limited company and its shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Defence Contract Dispute Over Encashment of Warranty Bond. The court held that the claims were not barred by limitation as bilateral discussions continued until 2019, and the arbitration clause covered the dispute.

The petitioner, a Swiss company engaged in arms manufacturing, entered into a contract with the Ministry of Defence, Government of India, for supply o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition by Corporation of the City of Panaji Challenging Compensation Award Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Holds That Petitioner Failed to Show Any Error in the Award and Scope of Judicial Review Is Limited.

The petitioner, Corporation of the City of Panaji, challenged an award dated 08.07.2014 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) under Section 48 ...