Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.
5 Mar 2026This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...
Search Results for "same title"
6727 result(s) found
Found 6727 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Order Rectifying Mutation Entry in Land Dispute — Holds Revenue Authority Cannot Adjudicate Title in Summary Proceedings Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The impugned order was set aside for lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice, and the Tahsildar was directed to restore the mutation entry as it stood prior to the order.
10 Aug 2023The petitioners, Namdev Mahadu Jambhulkar and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 10th December 2021 passed by the Tahsildar, Mul...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Interim Application for Possession Restoration and Injunction in a Suit Filed Under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The plaintiffs sought interim restoration of possession and injunction against alienation, alleging forcible dispossession from commercial premises after years of possession and investment.
16 Oct 2025The dispute involved a suit filed under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, by Ashapura Options Private Limited and others against Ashapura De...
- 16
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Forest Land Dispute — Patta Claim Fails for Lack of Original Title Documents. Notification Under Repealed Act Not Invalid if Consistent with New Law; Revenue Entries Without Supporting Documents Lack Evidentiary Value.
6 May 2026The case involves a dispute over 600 acres of land in Survey No. 81, Kalvalanagaram Village, Khammam District (now in Telangana). The Appellants claim...
- 233
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Sale Dispute — Unilateral Cancellation of Registered Sale Deed Held Invalid Without Consent or Court Order. A registered sale deed cannot be cancelled unilaterally by the vendor; cancellation requires mutual consent or a court decree under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and the Registration Act, 1908.
22 Aug 2023The case involves a property dispute where the original plaintiff (now represented by his legal heirs) filed a suit for declaration of title and posse...
- 1628
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute: Transfer of Property Act Section 43 Protects Purchaser When Vendor Subsequently Acquires Title. The Court held that the doctrine of feeding the grant by estoppel under Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, applies when a vendor sells land without title at the time of sale but later acquires title, and the purchaser is entitled to the benefit of the subsequently acquired interest.
1 Feb 2019The appellant, Tanu Ram Bora, purchased suit land by a registered sale deed dated 06.01.1990 from Pranab Kumar Bora, husband of defendant no.2 and fat...
- 711
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Impleadment Application in Specific Performance Suit — Applicants Lack Direct Interest in Subject Property. Chamber Summons for impleadment as defendants rejected as applicants failed to establish any legal or equitable interest in the property under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
8 Dec 2017The judgment concerns a Chamber Summons filed by M/s. Nestor Construction Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. Ayub Khan Jalil Khan seeking impleadment as defendant Nos....
- 98
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State Bank of India in Jet Airways Insolvency Case — Holds Performance Bank Guarantee Cannot Be Adjusted Against Resolution Plan Payment and Non-Implementation Leads to Liquidation. The Court ruled that the SRA's failure to pay airport dues and employee dues constituted non-implementation of the Resolution Plan under Section 33(3) IBC, 2016, and the PBG cannot be set off against the first tranche payment.
13 Nov 2024The case pertains to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Jet Airways (India) Limited, initiated by State Bank of India (SBI) under S...
- 414
High Court
Bombay High Court Admitted Second Appeal on Questions of Law Concerning Insolvency Act and Auction Sale Confirmation. The Court Framed Eight Substantial Questions Involving Interpretation of Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, Order 21 Rule 92 CPC, and Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings.
10 Jun 2013The matter concerned a long-standing insolvency dispute dating back to 1959. Roopsingh Chainsingh Ture filed Insolvency Application No.12 of 1959 befo...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court's Review Order in Mutation Dispute — Review Power Cannot Be Used to Rehear Merits After Dismissal of SLP. The High Court's review order was set aside as it sought to re-examine the merits after the Supreme Court had dismissed the SLP against the original judgment, and the contempt petition was barred by limitation.
1 Jan 2024The present appeals arise from a long-standing property dispute concerning land known as 'Asman Jahi Paigah' in Raidurg village. The original suit for...
- 550
