Search Results for "reopening assessment"

438 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 438 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Non-Compliance with Section 148A(b) Procedure. Notice Issued After 01.04.2021 Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Section 148A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is Invalid Despite TOLA Extension.

The petitioner, Jayeshkumar Narsidas Madlani, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice issued unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Section 153C Notices for Lack of Valid Satisfaction Note in Search Case. Satisfaction Note Must Record Assessing Officer's Independent Application of Mind to Incriminating Material Before Issuing Notice Under Section 153C of Income-tax Act, 1961.

The petitioners, including Devang Hiralal Vaghasia, filed multiple writ petitions challenging notices issued under Section 153C of the Income-tax Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Independent Application of Mind. Reopening Based on Borrowed Satisfaction from Investigation Wing Without Fresh Material Held Invalid.

The petitioner, Welcome Plywood Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 13 March 2015 proposing to reassess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Issued to Dead Person Under Income Tax Act — Notice Issued After Death Without Substituting Legal Heir Is Null and Void. Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued in the name of a deceased assessee is invalid and cannot be cured.

The petitioner, Raniben Khimji Patel, is the legal heir of Khimji Karamshi Patel who died on 2nd March 2021. The Income Tax Department issued a notice...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal: Rectification Under Section 35 of Income-tax Act Valid for Mistake Arising from Retrospective Amendment. Retrospective Operation of Proviso to Section 18-A(5) Renders Original Assessment Order Erroneous on Face of Record.

The dispute arose from the retrospective amendment of Section 18-A(5) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 by the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 195...