Search Results for "possession delay"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "possession delay"

3713 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3713 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals Under Section 96 CPC Against Common Judgment; Trial Court Partly Decreed Suit for Permanent Injunction and Dismissed Suit for Declaration and Possession. Title Dispute Arises from Conflicting Chain of Transfers Involving Original Owner Muniyappa, GPA Holder, and Subsequent Buyers.

16 Oct 2019

These two Regular First Appeals arose from a common judgment of the VIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, dated 21-06-2014. The di...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Orders Partial Release of Goods from Court Receiver's Custody in Section 9 Arbitration Petition. Goods Not Included in Petitioner's Claim List Released on Petitioner's Consent, Pending Determination of Third-Party's Bona Fide Purchaser Status.

22 Oct 2019

JSW Steel Limited entered into a Franchise Agreement dated 1 July 2018 with three sister concerns (Delta Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd., Yatin Steels Indi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit: Time Spent in Order IX Rule 13 Proceedings Can Constitute Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeal Under Section 96(2) CPC. The Court held that the right of appeal under Section 96(2) CPC is a statutory right and cannot be barred by dismissal of an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, and that time spent in pursuing such proceedings can be considered sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908.

7 May 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Bhivchandra Shankar More against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had refused to condone the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records — Dispute Over Inheritance and Possession of Agricultural Land. Mutation Entry Quashed as Revenue Authorities Cannot Adjudicate Title; Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Madhumati Suresh Raut and Muktabai Raghunath Raut, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the mutation entry ...

High Court

High Court Allows Impleadment Application in Property Appeal Despite 14-Year Delay. Application under Order XXII Rule 10 read with Order I Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 granted as no time limit prescribed for devolution of interest, and impleadment avoids abatement without prejudice to appellants.

5 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a suit for possession filed in 1974, which was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs in 2011. The defendants appealed, and during ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal and Petition Challenging KIADB Land Allotment — No Pre-existing Right of Appellant Established. Allotment to Third Party Upheld as Valid Under KIAD Act, 1966.

20 Jul 2016

The appellant, Garden City Fashions Pvt Ltd, filed a writ appeal and a writ petition challenging the allotment of land by the Karnataka Industrial Are...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Refund to Flat Purchaser for Inordinate Delay in Possession — Builder's Unfair Contract Terms Not Binding. Builder's failure to apply for occupancy certificate within stipulated time constitutes deficiency of service; one-sided clauses in Apartment Buyer's Agreement are unfair and not binding under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

2 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. against orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Allowing One Time Settlement in Debt Recovery Case — Interest Must Be Calculated as Per OTS Terms. The court held that the DRT erred in not giving effect to the OTS and in calculating interest beyond the OTS terms, and the DRAT correctly set aside the DRT order.

10 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) and India SME Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., challenged an order dated 26th Ma...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notifications invoking urgency under Section 17(4) and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5A upheld as land was necessary for residential colony scheme and decision based on subjective satisfaction of authority.

23 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Bulandshhar ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Defendants to File Written Statement in Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession — Delay Condoned Due to Lack of Notice and Sufficient Cause. The court held that the trial court ought to have taken a liberal view and condoned the delay in filing the written statement under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC, as the defendants had a right to contest the suit on merits and the delay was not intentional.

11 Jan 2018

The petitioners, who were defendants in O.S.No.6525/2012 before the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, filed writ petitions under Art...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)