Search Results for "order set aside"

31349 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31349 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeal in Summary Suit Under Commercial Courts Act — Order on Summons for Judgment Challenged as 'Judgment' Under Section 13(1A). Transitional Provisions and Assignment Orders Examined for Pending Suits Transferred to Commercial Division.

The Commercial Appeal arose from an order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Commercial Division of the Bombay High Court in Summons for Judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Vacate Interim Injunction in Development Agreement Dispute. Plaintiff's Readiness and Willingness Not Shown to Be Lacking Due to Defendant's Own Conduct Under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC.

The Bombay High Court dismissed an application filed by defendant No.1A (Vivek Madhavlal Pittie) seeking vacation of an interim injunction granted on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows University Appeal in Increment Dispute Under UGC Scheme. Two Advance Increments Denied to Lecturer Holding Ph.D. on Placement as Selection Grade Lecturer Upheld.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which directed the Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit to grant two advance i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Raman & Raman Ltd. in Stage Carriage Permit Matter, Quashing Appellate Authority's Order. Section 43A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, Holds Only Administrative Power; Directions Issued Are Not Law and Cannot Affect Prior Permits.

The appellant, M/s. Raman & Raman Ltd., was one of several applicants for a stage carriage permit. The Regional Transport Authority granted the permit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Restoration of Suit Dismissed for Default, Condoning Delay of Over 4 Years Due to Sufficient Cause. The Court held that the Trial Court's rejection of condonation was perverse and that a liberal approach is warranted under Order IX Rule 9 CPC and Section 5 of Limitation Act.

The petitioner, heir of the original plaintiff, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging ...