Search Results for "negative response"

931 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 931 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court hears and determines Notice of Motion No. 1211 of 2014 in Suit No. 777 of 2014 seeking interim injunctions and appointment of administrator. The court examines rival claims of family arrangements and fiduciary capacity over Gopal Raheja Group assets.

The dispute arose out of the affairs of the Gopal Raheja Group, a real estate business originally established by Lachmandas Raheja and continued by hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order Allowing Counter-Claim in Property Suit. Amendment of Plaint After Issues Settled Constitutes Exceptional Circumstance Justifying Filing of Counter-Claim Under Order VIII Rule 6-A CPC.

The petitioner, Vijaymala Sidling Doijad, filed a suit (Regular Civil Suit No.1056 of 2006) seeking injunction against the State of Maharashtra and th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 as Valid Regulatory Legislation. High Court erred in striking down entire Act; provisions conflicting with UGC Act are severable.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment striking down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Interception Orders in CBI Corruption Case for Lack of Reasons and Public Emergency. Orders under Section 5(2) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 set aside as they merely recited statutory language without recording cogent reasons demonstrating public safety or public emergency.

The petitioner, Shyamalendu Kumar Das, a Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), challenged two orders dated 9 March 2018 and 17 March 2018 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...