Search Results for "grounds not pressed"

2011 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2011 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Additional Documents in Arbitration Petition Despite Delay, Subject to Costs — Charge-Sheet Filed Against Contractor Relevant to Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two notices of motion filed in pending commercial arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Broker-Client Dispute. Court Upholds Award Directing Payment of Rs.1,58,39,459.87 but Refuses Interest and Costs Under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Harinarayan Bajaj, entered into various share transactions on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) through the respondent, Madhukar Sheth, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Writ Petitions Against School Tribunal’s Order in Headmaster Promotion Dispute. Challenge to Promotion on Grounds of Jurisdiction, Delay, and Minority School Status.

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, arose from two writ petitions challenging the judgment and order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.

Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals in Motor Accident Claims Challenging Tribunal's Absolution of Insurer and Inadequate Compensation. Claimants Argue That Insurer Failed to Prove Driving Licence Breach and Must Pay Under 'Pay and Recover' Principle of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeals arose from a motor vehicle accident on 30.06.2009 where a husband and wife on a motorcycle were hit by a rashly driven Light Goods Vehicle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. Court Holds That the Arbitrator's Finding on Limitation Was Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arises from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revocation of Multi-System Operator Registrations for Non-Compliance with Rule 11(7) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. The Court found that the denial of security clearance was not communicated and no opportunity of hearing was afforded.

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd. and Digi Cable Network (India) Pvt. Ltd., along with Digi Navi Mumbai Network Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions under Artic...