Search Results for "consent irrelevant"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "consent irrelevant"

1367 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1367 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Appeal Against Denial of Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Passing Off Dispute, Holding No Prima Facie Case or Balance of Convenience. Phonetic Similarity of 'CHYMTRAL FORTE' to 'CHYMORAL FORTE' Insufficient for Interim Relief Where Drugs are Schedule H Prescription Medicines and Public Interest Favors Affordable Pricing.

17 Nov 2017

The dispute arose from Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited's claim that Wockhardt Limited and East African (India) Remedies Pvt. Ltd. were passing off the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 44 of 2012. Appeal Challenges Conviction for Rape, Kidnapping, and Criminal Intimidation of Minor Girl Under IPC Sections 376, 366A, 506(2).

7 Aug 2017

The appeal arose from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 410 of 2010, convicting the appellant/accused no.1 und...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears CBI's Appeal Against Acquittal in British Minor's Death Case; Trial Court Found CBI Investigation Invalid Without Proper Authorization. The trial court held that the CBI chargesheet was a fresh one and not a supplementary chargesheet, and that no notification empowered the CBI to register a new FIR in Mumbai.

17 Jul 2019

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed an appeal under Section 378(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Cross Appeals Arising from Conviction of Beat Marshal for Rape, Wrongful Confinement, and Criminal Intimidation, and Acquittal for Violation of Prohibition Act. The appeals concern the conviction of a beat marshal for rape, wrongful confinement, and criminal intimidation under the Indian Penal Code, and the State's challenge to the acquittal under the Bombay Prohibition Act and the sentence imposed.

6 May 2011

The matter arose from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, convicting the accused, a beat marshal, for raping a 17-year-old prosecutri...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Addresses Requirement of Leave Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 and Applicability of IBC Moratorium in Admiralty Proceedings. Court Considers Whether Admiralty Suits Are Affected by Company Liquidation Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 and Moratorium Under Section 14 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in Light of Competing Claims of Maritime Creditors and Operation of Insolvency Law.

19 May 2020

The proceedings arose from multiple admiralty suits filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, wherein orders of arrest of defendant vessels...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Municipal Corporation's Demand for Transfer Fees and Unilateral Imposition of Fresh Lease Terms. Lease Renewal Must Be on Existing Terms Unless Mutually Agreed, and Transfer of Leasehold Interest Does Not Attract Transfer Fees Without Specific Statutory Provision.

5 Aug 2022

The petitioners, ten individuals and a company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the actions of the Na...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and no exceptional grounds were made out for interference under Article 226.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Phoenix ARC Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, acting as a trust, filed two writ petitions under Art...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MCGM Demand Notice for Unauthorised Construction Penalty Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Section 53(1) of MMC Act, 1888 does not empower the Corporation to levy penalty for unauthorised construction after the fact; remedy lies in demolition under Section 351 or regularisation under DCR.

17 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Zenith Tins Private Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing, challenged a demand notice dated 20th January 2015 issued by the Muni...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction in Revision — Sentence Reduced to 4 Years R.I. Based on Credible Testimony of Prosecutrix Under Section 376 IPC. Minor Contradictions in Prosecution Evidence Do Not Warrant Acquittal as Testimony of Victim is Found Reliable and Trustworthy.

15 Dec 2006

The applicant, Tekaram s/o Krishna Ghormare, was convicted under Section 376 IPC by the 2nd Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Bhandara on 18.12.2003 in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Stepfather in POCSO Case Due to DNA Evidence Excluding Paternity — Scientific Evidence Overrides Circumstantial and Testimonial Weaknesses in Rape Conviction Under Sections 376(2)(f),(i),(j) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Govind alias Hemrab s/o Mahadeo Deolkar/Deulkar, was convicted by the learned Designated Judge, POCSO Act and Additional Sessions Judge...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)