Search Results for "conciliation under CPC"

515 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 515 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Removal of Assets in Commercial Suit Despite Arbitration Clause — Interim Relief Granted Under Order 39 CPC. Trial Court Directed to Decide Interim Application on Merits Without Considering Maintainability Based on Arbitration Clause.

The petitioner, INOX Leisure Limited, filed a commercial suit against Indo Pacific Projects Limited seeking recovery of security deposit and permissio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Refund of Court Fees in Motor Accident Claims Settled Through Lok Adalat or Mediation Under Section 89 CPC. Fees paid under Rule 278(i) of Motor Vehicles Rules, 1991 are refundable under Section 16 of Court Fees Act, 1870 read with Section 21 of Legal Services Act, 1987.

The Bombay High Court at Goa took suo motu cognizance of a submission by the Registrar (Judicial) & Member Secretary of the Goa State Legal Services A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petitions Against Government Order Appointing Administrator for Murugha Mutt Under Articles 162 and 31A of Constitution; Appointment Follows Pontiff's Judicial Custody in Criminal Case

The writ petitions, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenged a Government Order dated 13.12.2022 appointing a retired IAS offi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Stamp Duty Dispute Over Arbitral Interim Order. Court Holds That an Order Under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Is Not an 'Award' Under Article 11 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, and Thus No Stamp Duty Is Payable.

The petitioners, Mrs. Shaila Mathias and Mrs. Yasmine Felix, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Loan Dispute, Upholds Financer's Claim. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement is not a jurisdictional issue under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the award is not patently illegal.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions: Arbitration Petition No. 783 of 2011 filed by the borrowers (M/s. Sahyadri Earthmovers and its partne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Execution Application for Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. Execution of Arbitral Award is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, Not Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., had granted a loan of Rs.3,95,000 to respondent No.1 for purchasing a tractor, with respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Consent Award in Arbitration — Consent Terms Cannot Be Unilaterally Withdrawn After Being Acted Upon. Arbitrator Not Required to Deliver Signed Award Under Section 31(5) When Award Is Made in Terms of Consent Terms Under Section 30.

The appellant, M/s. Pandi Devi Oil Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arb...