Search Results for "additional fee"

1919 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1919 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Claimants in Motor Accident Claims for Deaths in Autorikshaw Collision with Truck — Negligence of Truck Driver Established, Contributory Negligence Not Proven. Compensation Enhanced with Multiplier 17, Future Prospects, and 7.5% Interest.

The appeals arise from a motor accident claim where three deceased persons (Madhukar Dabhalkar, Kailash Bathe, and Kadusing Rajput) died in a collisio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Stays Amendment to Rule 5A of PGET Rules, 2006 Pending Final Disposal — In-Service Medical Officers Challenge Mid-Selection Change in Weightage Methodology. Interim Stay of Notification Operative Pending Final Disposal.

The petitioners, six in-service medical officers working as General Duty Medical Officers in Karnataka, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines MCD's Recovery Notices Against MEPIDL for Territorial Overreach. Cross-Petitions on Attachment of Assets Outside Delhi Under DMC Act, 1957.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 28th September 2017 between MEP Infrastructure Developers Limited (MEPIDL), a Mumbai-based enterprise, and the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Bus Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Owner Held Liable for Compensation Due to Invalid Permit and Route Violation. Concurrent findings of fact that vehicle was plied without valid permit and on unauthorized route upheld; no interference warranted.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, a 24-year-old Managing Director of a company, died in a collision with a bus owned by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in Suit Settled by Consent Terms. The phrase 'claim for repayment' in Section 43(1) proviso of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 refers to the application to the court for refund order, not the subsequent certificate application.

The suit was filed in 2014 by Bai Mamubai Bhimji Bhanji Trust and others against Neelkanth Mansions & Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. On 28 October 2014, the ...