Search Results for "Section 236"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Section 236"

693 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 693 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, in a PIL filed by a trade union of airport employees, pronounced an order on 14-09-2021, examining the legality of the privatisation of Mangaluru International Airport under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. The court considered allegations that the concession agreement with Adani Enterprises Limited violated Sections 12, 12A, and 21 of the Act, and that the bidding process lacked transparency.

14 Sep 2021

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by the Airports Authority Employees Union, a registered trade ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Public Interest Litigations in Road Development Contract Dispute. Reiterates Stringent Locus Standi Requirements Under Article 226 to Prevent Abuse of Process by Meddlesome Bystanders.

14 Oct 2014

The Bombay High Court examined the maintainability of multiple public interest litigations and writ petitions concerning the Kolhapur Integrated Road ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Case — Order Rejecting Intervention Application Not an Interim Order Under Section 18. The court held that an order rejecting an application for intervention under Order I Rule 10 CPC is not an 'interim order' under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, and therefore an appeal lies before the DRAT.

29 Jan 2025

The petitioner, G. Corp Lotus Mall Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against KSFC Order in Guarantor Liability Case — Limitation Period for Filing Application Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act Is Three Years from Date of Cause of Action. Guarantor's Defence of Limitation Upheld as Petition Filed Beyond Three Years from NPA Classification.

15 Apr 2025

The appellant, Smt. C. Sarasamma, was a guarantor for a loan availed by respondent No.2, M/s. Ethnic Informatics Private Ltd., from respondent No.1, K...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Father-Daughter Rape Case: POCSO Act Overrides IPC for Offence but Greater Punishment Applies Under Section 42. The Court held that Section 42 of POCSO Act mandates application of law providing greater punishment, and High Court cannot enhance sentence without appeal.

2 Sep 2024

The appellant, Gyanendra Singh @ Raja Singh, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 376(2)(f) and 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal: Rectification Under Section 35 of Income-tax Act Valid for Mistake Arising from Retrospective Amendment. Retrospective Operation of Proviso to Section 18-A(5) Renders Original Assessment Order Erroneous on Face of Record.

28 Apr 1958

The dispute arose from the retrospective amendment of Section 18-A(5) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 by the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 195...

High Court

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2000

7 Mar 2011

The appeal arose from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Beed, which convicted the appellant for offences under Sections 393/34, 324, and 353 of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Interstate Child Trafficking Case Due to Perverse High Court Orders and Absconding Accused. Bail Granted Without Considering Gravity of Offences Under Sections 363, 311, 370(5) IPC and Organized Nature of Racket.

15 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court dealt with a series of appeals filed by victims' families seeking cancellation of bail granted by the Allahabad High Court to 13 acc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeals, Upholding Quashing of Agricultural Income-tax Assessments for Lack of Individual Notices and Limitation. Best Judgment Assessments Under Section 20(4) of Assam Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1939 Are Invalid if No Individual Notice Under Section 19(2) Was Served and No Escaped Assessment Proceedings Under Section 30 Were Initiated Within Three Years of Financial Year.

7 Aug 1969

The case involved two sets of assessees who owned or purchased tea estates in Assam and were subjected to agricultural income-tax assessments for seve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision Allowing Interest Deduction Under Section 36(1)(iii) for Dealer in Shares. Interest on Borrowed Funds for Investment in Shares Held as Stock-in-Trade is Business Expenditure, Not to be Reduced from Dividend Income Under Section 57(iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

30 Sep 2005

This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appella...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)