Search Results for "Rule 58(4)"

347 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 347 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Executability of Specific Performance Decree Despite Delay in Deposit of Balance Consideration. Non-Deposit Within Stipulated Time Does Not Automatically Render Decree Inexecutable; Judgment-Debtor Must Seek Rescission Under Section 28 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The case involves a dispute over the execution of a decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land. The appellant, Habban S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Refund of Earnest Money with Interest. Plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness for specific performance, but defendant must refund earnest money with 12% interest under Section 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant (plaintiff) entered into a sale agreement dated 19.03.2010 with the respondents (defendants) for purchase of property bearing Survey No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Sanction. Decoy Trap Found Vitiated as Panch Witnesses Were Police Employees and Sanction for Prosecution Was Not Obtained Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 19.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. The court held that the trial court's acquittal under Section 302 IPC was not perverse as the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Masla Ditiya Rathwa, who was charged with murder under Section 302 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows ESIC Appeal in ESI Coverage Dispute - Section 2A and Regulation 10B Held Mandatory. Employer's Failure to Obtain Code Number Does Not Excuse Contribution Liability Under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

The appeal was filed by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) under Section 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 against the order...