Search Results for "Rule 330"

376 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 376 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Judicial Immunity and IBC Proceedings as Abuse of Process. Challenge to Section 3 of Judges (Protection) Act, 1985 and Section 7 of IBC held to be frivolous and not maintainable.

The petitioner, Mrs. Manisha Nimesh Mehta, as promoter and guarantor of M/s. Perfect Infraengineers Ltd., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Blue Zone Classification Not Proved by State. Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Awards for Similar Lands Acquired for Same Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to the acquisition of land owned by the appellant, Kazi Akiloddin, for the construction of a flood protection wall in Akola, Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Commercial Dispute Over Soyabean Supply — No Cheating Intent Established. Contractual Breach Without Deceitful Intention from Inception Does Not Attract Section 420 IPC.

The applicants, a partnership firm named Sagacious Impex, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Quash Summons in Cheque Dishonour Case — Factual Defences Cannot Be Adjudicated Under Section 482 CrPC. Legal Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Favours Complainant at Pre-Trial Stage.

The appellant, Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan, was the accused in a criminal complaint filed by Satish Gupta (respondent no. 2) under Section 138 of the Ne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Director in Drugs Act Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Director Not Vicariously Liable Under Section 18(a)(i) r/w Section 27(d) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Without Evidence of Being In Charge of Day-to-Day Affairs.

The petitioner, Sanjeev Wasan, a director of Maxmed Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal writ petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal ...