Search Results for "Punjab Sales Tax Act"

329 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 329 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Package Tendering System for Road Works. Policy Decision to Reintroduce Package System Upheld as Valid Executive Action Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by individual contractors challenging the Government Order G.O.(Ms) No.162, Highways & Minor Ports (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute, Upholds Dissolution Over Retirement. Court clarifies distinction between retirement of a partner and dissolution of a partnership firm under the Partnership Act, 1932.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Guru Nanak Industries and Swaran Singh (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Service for Time Bound Promotion Should Be Reckoned from Initial Appointment or Regularisation Date. Government Resolution and Supreme Court Precedents on 'Regular Service' Interpreted in Context of TBPS and ACPS.

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by the State of Maharashtra under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes University Order Revising Pay Scale with Retrospective Effect Without Notice - Violation of Natural Justice in Service Matter. The court held that any order affecting the pay of an employee with retrospective effect must be preceded by a notice and opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, Dr. Bugui Dessai, was appointed as a Reader in Inorganic Chemistry at Goa University in June 1987 and confirmed in service in June 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Forest Guards in Promotion Dispute — Circular Revocation Invalid Without Proper Rescission. State Government's Order Dated 14.05.2009 Did Not Revoke Earlier Circular of 17.10.1977; Subsequent Revocation Order Dated 11.06.2012 Was Not Given Retrospective Effect.

The case involves two appeals by Forest Guards, Omkar Sinha and another, against the State of Chhattisgarh and others, concerning their entitlement to...