Search Results for "Prothonotary order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Prothonotary order"

465 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 465 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Loan Dispute, Upholds Financer's Claim. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement is not a jurisdictional issue under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the award is not patently illegal.

17 Dec 2012

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions: Arbitration Petition No. 783 of 2011 filed by the borrowers (M/s. Sahyadri Earthmovers and its partne...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Cessed Building Without Compliance with Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Court holds that prior permission of the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 is mandatory before demolition of a cessed building.

6 Sep 2019

The petitioners, tenants of a cessed building known as 'Shreeji Krupa' in Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of the building by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions for Appointment of Arbitrator Due to Absence of Arbitration Agreement. Invoices Relied Upon by Distributors Did Not Contain Arbitration Clause, and No Other Agreement Was Produced.

30 Oct 2015

The judgment involves multiple arbitration petitions filed by various distributors (petitioners) against Elder Pharmaceuticals Limited (respondent) se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Plaintiff to Bear Costs of Discharge and Storage of Arrested Cargo in Admiralty Suit. The court held that a party who secures an order of arrest of cargo cannot insist that the shipowner bear the costs of discharging and storing the cargo, as the shipowner is not a party to the arrest and the cargo is in custodia legis.

27 Jun 2016

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the owner of the vessel m.v. Ocean 39 (the ship interests) seeking directions against the plaintiff, Cup...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Court Receiver in Arbitration Dispute Over Mortgaged Properties. Court holds that appointment of receiver pending arbitration is permissible under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but the impugned order was passed without proper application of mind and without considering the balance of convenience.

17 Jan 2017

The case involves two commercial appeals filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, challenging a common order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Revocation of Probate in Indian Succession Act Case Due to Lack of Caveatable Interest and Proof of Adoption. Allegations of Fraud and Non-Service of Citation on Heirs Fail as Petitioner Fails to Establish Locus Standi and Execution of Will is Upheld.

10 Oct 2017

The Bombay High Court heard a miscellaneous petition filed by the nephew of a deceased woman seeking revocation of a probate granted in favor of the r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Ad-Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit for 'Orient' Electric Appliances. Plaintiff's Longstanding Use and Registration of 'Orient' Mark Found Sufficient for Interim Protection Against Defendants' Identical Mark.

5 Feb 2013

The plaintiff, Orient Paper & Industries Limited, filed a suit before the Bombay High Court alleging trade mark infringement and passing off against d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Banking Investment Dispute - Failure of Respondent to Nominate Arbitrator Triggers Court's Power Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising out of an Agreement dated 18th April, 2018 and Deed of Guarantee dated 18th April, 2018, as the respondent failed to nominate an arbitrator.

17 Jul 2023

The applicant, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., a public company and banking company, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Concili...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Loan Amounts Based on Bills of Exchange. Disputed Questions of Fact Regarding Repayment and Interest Rates Require Trial Under Order XXXVII CPC.

9 Nov 2022

The judgment concerns two Commercial Summary Suits filed by a mother (Kavita G. Rajani) and her son (Gautam G. Rajani) against a common defendant, Sam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd v. Williamson Magor & Co Ltd & Anr — Put Option Agreement Dispute. The court found that a valid arbitration agreement existed based on correspondence and conduct, and appointed a former judge as arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)