Search Results for "Pradhan"

455 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 455 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Agreement for Sale of Open Amenity Space by Municipal Corporation to Private Developer. Municipal Corporation Cannot Alienate Public Amenity Space Reserved Under Development Plan Without Following Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Prashant Bhagwantrao Palande, a resident of Mira Road, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Railway Accident Claim — Illiteracy and Poverty Constitute Sufficient Cause Under Section 17(2) of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. The Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal and remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits.

The appellant, Saraswati Giri, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, following the death of her son in a tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Municipal Notice Case — Lack of Delegation of Powers Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Notice Issued by Assistant Engineer Without Authorization from Commissioner Held Invalid Under Section 381 of the Act.

The petitioner, Kishanlal Udaylal Jain, through his power of attorney holder, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Rationing Officer in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness testimony insufficient.

The appellant, Pandharinath Shelke, was a Rationing Officer at the Rationing Office, Kurla. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Bombay in S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Adverse Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that claim of adverse possession must be proved with clear and unequivocal evidence of hostile possession for the statutory period.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (now appellants) against the judgment of the lower Appellate Court which dismissed ...