KAHC020032022013_1
30 Apr 2014...
Search Results for "Person Interested"
4281 result(s) found
Found 4281 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, considers landlord's writ petitions against appellate authority's rejection of eviction on bonafide need under the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949. The dispute centers on whether the landlord established genuine requirement for the tenanted premises for family businesses and whether the appellate authority erred in overturning the Rent Controller's findings.
20 Jan 2006The dispute before the High Court arose out of three writ petitions filed by landlord Ismalibhai Gulam Hussain challenging the orders of the Additiona...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Entry of Petitioner as Suspect in Charge-Sheet Holding Naming Suspect Without Evidence Illegal. Describing Person as Suspect in Police Report Under Section 173 CrPC Violates Procedure Established by Law and Right to Reputation Under Article 21.
24 Jan 2011The dispute arose from the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) paper scam case. The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) registered an FIR on 20 June...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.
8 Aug 2024The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...
- 1162
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Accused in Murder Case, Restoring Acquittal Due to Unjustified Interference by High Court. High Court's Reversal of Acquittal Under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC Set Aside as Trial Court's View Was Plausible and Not Perse Under Principles of Section 378 Cr.P.C.
6 May 2021The dispute arose from a criminal appeal before the Supreme Court of India, where the appellant, an accused in a murder case, challenged the High Cour...
- 270
High Court
High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony was not corroborated and recovery of tainted money was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
30 Aug 2023The appellant, Babarao Shyamrao Vitalkar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No.5/1996 for offences under Section 7 and Sectio...
- 15
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Robbery and Murder Case. Circumstantial evidence and test identification parade found insufficient to convict accused No.2 under Sections 392, 302, 468, 201 read with 34 IPC.
11 Oct 2019This criminal appeal arose from the acquittal of the second accused by the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in Sessions Case No.724...
- 60
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Applicability of Section 28A(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to Modified Awards of Reference Court. The core legal question involved the interpretation of Section 28A(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as inserted by the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984, and its application to awards of the Reference Court that modified the original award of the Special Land Acquisition Officer.
14 Sep 2021The judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay addressed a batch of writ petitions arising from land acquisition proceedings for the public pu...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging MPID Act Application in NSEL Scam Case — Held That MPID Act Applies to NSEL as a Financial Establishment and That Default in Repayment of Deposits Attracts Offences Under the Act.
7 Feb 2025The judgment arises from multiple criminal appeals and interim applications filed by various parties, including directors, brokers, and financial inst...
- 762
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Compensation and Betterment Charges for CIDCO Metro Project. Court upholds compensation determined under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and rejects waiver of betterment charges under CIDCO Act.
4 Mar 2025The judgment pertains to a group of five writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for the Metro Centre project of CIDCO in Panvel,...
- 775
