Search Results for "Partly Decreed"

1014 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1014 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Oral Agreement for Sale of Shop. Oral Agreement for Sale of Immovable Property Not Enforceable Under Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Section 17 of Registration Act, 1908.

The appellant, original plaintiff, filed an appeal against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Suit No.590 of 1980, whe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Eviction Decree in Partnership Property Dispute. Concurrent findings of fact that defendants were licensees, not tenants, upheld under Article 227.

The petitioners (original defendants) were a partnership firm occupying premises owned by the respondent (original plaintiff) partnership firm. Initia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when courts below have concurrently found that suit property is joint family property and plaintiff is entitled to share.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendants No.2 to 4 against the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Latur, in Regul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Court Receiver's Report and Additional Report in Land Dispute — Directs Demarcation and Removal of Encroachments. Court upholds Receiver's authority to manage suit property and take steps to protect it from unauthorized development.

The case pertains to a long-standing dispute over land survey No.34/1 and 35/3 at Panchpakhadi, Thane. The appellants had challenged a trial court ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Railway Licence Plot Dispute — Courts Below Failed to Consider Admission Under Order VIII CPC. Refund of Rs.50,050 with 18% Interest Upheld as Railway's Admission of Receipt Not Denied.

The original plaintiff, Bhika s/o Antu Kale, a retired Railway servant, filed Regular Civil Suit No.996 of 1987 against the Railways for possession an...