Search Results for "Maharashtra Rent Control Act 1999"

671 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 671 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeals Against Grant-in-Aid Claims Under Repealed 1994 Order. Employees of Non-Government Educational Institutions Entitled to Grant-in-Aid Despite Repeal of Orissa (Non Government Colleges, Junior Colleges and Higher Secondary Schools) Grant-in-Aid Order, 1994.

The case involves a batch of civil appeals filed by the State of Odisha against various respondents, who are employees of non-government educational i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Possession Recovery in Trespass Suit Against Unauthorized Occupant of Tenanted Premises. Statutory Tenancy Cannot Be Bequeathed by Will; Only Heirs Entitled Under Section 5(11)(c) of Bombay Rent Act.

The plaintiff, Shaikh Jaber Abdulah J AI Sabah, owner of the suit building AlJabriya Court at Marine Drive, Mumbai, filed a suit for recovery of posse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Development Control Regulation 33(7) Allowing Enhanced FSI for Reconstruction. Petition Filed by Public-Spirited Citizens Claims Regulation Exacerbates Population Congestion in Island City.

This public interest litigation, filed by three public-spirited citizens of Mumbai, challenged the legality of Regulation 33(7) of the Development Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Fixes Interim Compensation for Tenant Pending Eviction Revision — Mesne Profits Determined Based on Valuer Reports and Rental Market. Tenant Ordered to Pay Rs.25,000 Per Month as Interim Compensation Under Section 12 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the tenant, Previn Govind Sharma, against an eviction decree passed by the Appellate Bench of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 2329 OF 2003

The petitioners, K.P. Power Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition in 2003 before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus to compel ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Substitution of Assignee in Pending DRT Proceedings Under SARFAESI Act. Assignment of debt under Section 5 of SARFAESI Act entitles assignee to continue pending recovery proceedings without fresh filing, and amendment of cause title is permissible.

The petitioner, Alpha and Omega Diagnostics India Ltd., challenged a common order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which upheld the orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Rent Recovery Suit. Denial of Landlord-Tenant Relationship Raises Triable Issue Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

The petitioner, original defendant in Regular Civil Suit No.447/2009, filed a Civil Revision Application challenging the order dated 23.09.2010 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Suit for License Fee and Compensation, Allows Defendant's Counter-Claim for Losses Due to Suppression of No Development Zone Status. Plaintiffs held liable for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding land use, entitling Defendant to damages for demolished tower.

The plaintiffs, owners of a larger property in Madh, Malad, Mumbai, entered into a leave and license agreement with the defendant, a telecom company, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Challenge to DCR 33(7) Surplus Area Surrender for Cessed Building Rehabilitation. Petitioners Contended Compulsory Acquisition Without Adequate Compensation.

The group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenged the constitutional validity of clause 4 of Appendix III to Regulation 33(7) of the...