Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"

678 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 678 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Allotment to Educational Society — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as No Legal Right Established Over Final Plot No.80

The petitioner, Abdul Hamid Ebrahim Chotani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a Standing Committe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Writ Petition Concerning Lapsing of Land Reservation. Petitioners Claim Notice Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Was Not Acted Upon by Authorities, Leading to Relief Sought.

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking a declaration that the reservation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Directions to Bhiwandi Nizampur Municipal Corporation for Demolition of Illegal Constructions and Grievance Redress. Court Takes Judicial Notice of Large-Scale Illegal RCC Buildings and Corporation's Inaction, Directing Survey, Nodal Officer, and Multi-Mode Complaint System.

Background: This group of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by various citizens of Bhiwandi Nizampur, complainin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Parking Space Regulations Under UDCPR in Navi Mumbai. Court holds that UDCPR provisions are statutory and binding, and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any illegality or public interest violation.

The petitioner, Sandeep Thakur, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging the parking space regulations under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening in Pune. Acquisition under Section 126 of MRTP Act for public purpose is valid and petitioner cannot claim title over land reserved for road.

The petitioner, Atur Park-4 Co-operative Housing Society Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of its land for road widening in P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowner's Petition for Release of Land from Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition for Over 45 Years. Land Reserved for Garden and Ring Road Since 1958 Deemed Released as Authority Failed to Act Within Six Months of Section 127 Notice.

The petitioner, Rajendra Rameshwardas Gindodiya, owned land Survey No.569/1 admeasuring 2 hectares and 12 ares in Dhule, which was ancestral property....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Chief Minister's Permission for Development on Recreational Ground in Public Interest Litigation. Section 47 MRTP Act Appeal Allowed Without Proper Application of Mind and Contrary to Development Plan Reservation.

The judgment arises from a public interest litigation filed by residents living around the Cooperage plot in Mumbai, represented by the Oval Cooperage...