Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act"

554 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 554 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Road Construction Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioners' claim of non-compliance with Section 126(4) MRTP Act fails as award was passed under Land Acquisition Act and possession taken long ago.

The petitioners, owners of land in Latur, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Municipal Council for construction of a development plan roa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal in Stamp Duty Dispute — Conveyance Deed Not Exempt Under Article 5(e) of Schedule I of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) by CIDCO to Developer Held Liable to Stamp Duty as Conveyance, Not as Instrument of Lease or License.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and other stamp authorities against a common judgment of a learned Sing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Municipal Corporation for Issuance of TDR Certificates. Transfer of Development Rights must be granted in accordance with Development Control Regulations and cannot be arbitrarily denied.

The petitioners in these four writ petitions are owners of lands that were acquired by the Amravati Municipal Corporation for the construction of a ro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MIDC's Reservation of Open Space for Staff Housing. Petitioner's claim for allotment of reserved open space fails as no legal right established and policy decisions of MIDC upheld.

The petitioner, a society of industrial members in MIDC Jalgaon area, filed a writ petition challenging communications dated July 3, 2002 and July 8, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Appeal for Injunction Against Demolition of Unauthorized Construction. Builder who constructed seven upper floors without permission and inducted flat purchasers without occupation certificate is not entitled to equitable relief of temporary injunction.

The appellant, M/s. Leela Enterprises, a partnership firm, filed an appeal against an order of the trial court refusing to grant a temporary injunctio...