Search Results for "MACT award enhancement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "MACT award enhancement"

420 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 420 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Motor Accident Claim, Holding That Negligence of Bus Driver Established on Preponderance of Probability. The Court Rules That Standard of Proof in Accident Claims Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is Preponderance of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt, and Sudden Movement of Bus While Passenger Alights Constitutes Negligence.

3 Aug 2023

This appeal arose from the dismissal of a claim petition by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and I Additional MACT, Karwar, in MVC No. 290/2017. The a...

High Court

High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Family Pension Cannot Be Deducted from Loss of Dependency. The Court held that family pension is a separate benefit and not deductible from compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and applied correct multiplier based on deceased's age.

14 Jun 2017

The appeal was filed by the claimants, the widow and children of Tukaram Mohite, who died in a motor vehicle accident on 22.03.2010. The deceased was ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Advocate Injured in Road Accident — Multiplier Method Applied for Loss of Future Earnings Due to Permanent Disability. The court held that for permanent disability, the multiplier method is appropriate, and enhanced compensation from Rs.6,96,704 to Rs.27,33,296 under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

1 Mar 2024

The appellant, Smt. Jayashree, an advocate aged 43 years, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensati...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Dismisses Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Negligence of Driver Not Proved, But Compensation Reduced Due to Error in Multiplier and Income Calculation. The Court held that the claimant failed to prove negligence, but on quantum, the Tribunal erred in applying multiplier 17 instead of 18 and in assessing income without basis, leading to recomputation of compensation.

14 Dec 2023

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, Vijay Praveen Cutinha, a 25-year-old driver, sustained grievous injur...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Dismisses Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Tribunal's Award Set Aside Due to Lack of Driving Licence and Invalid Insurance Policy. The Court held that the Insurance Company is not liable to pay compensation under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 when the driver did not possess a valid driving licence at the time of accident.

25 Jun 2026

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Dharmapuri, in M.C.O.P.No. 341 of 2018. The first...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Insurer's Appeal Dismissed. Claimant awarded Rs.14,19,000/- for grievous injuries sustained in road accident under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

26 Mar 2014

The judgment pertains to two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, B.N. Dhananjaya, sustained grievous injuries in a road acciden...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Insurer's Appeal Dismissed. Claimant awarded additional compensation for permanent disability and loss of income due to amputation of leg.

26 Mar 2014

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, B.N. Dhananjaya, sustained grievous injuries including amputation of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Disbelief of Eyewitness — Negligence of Car Driver Established. The court restored the Tribunal's award of Rs. 16,08,000 with interest, holding that the High Court's rejection of the eyewitness was conjectural and that the accident was caused by the car driver's rash and negligent driving.

1 Jan 2020

The case arises from a motor accident on 25.03.2009 near Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh, where a car driven by Sanjeev Kapoor collided with a truck. Sandeep ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 10,52,000 to Rs. 16,82,000. Multiplier Corrected from 13 to 14 Based on Deceased's Age of 35 Years, Future Prospects Added at 40%, and Deduction Reduced to 1/4th for Five Dependents.

19 Feb 2018

The claimants, being the wife, minor children, and parents of deceased Shivanna, filed an appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Negligence of Truck Driver Proved, Multiplier Corrected to 13. The court applied multiplier 13 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC and added 50% future prospects as per Rajesh v. Rajbir Singh, enhancing total compensation from Rs. 5,27,500/- to Rs. 8,37,000/-.

30 Aug 2016

The appeal was filed by the claimants, who are the legal representatives of the deceased Shashikant Bharma Murashetti, seeking enhancement of compensa...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)