Search Results for "Land encroachment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Land encroachment"

874 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 874 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Criminal Revision Seeking Direction for Registration of FIR Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. in Alleged Government Land Encroachment Matter. The Court Ruled That a Social Activist Without Personal Right Lacks Locus Standi and That Mere Allegation of Encroachment Without Disclosing Essential Ingredients of a Cognizable Offence Does Not Justify Invocation of Criminal Process.

7 Jul 2026

The litigation arose from a criminal revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging an order of the Ju...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Encroachment Removal on Temple Land Subject to Pending Patta Enquiry — Writ of Mandamus Disposed with 12-Week Timeline. Court Held That Authorities Must First Complete Enquiry Ordered by Single Judge in Related Writ Before Acting on Encroachment Complaint.

30 Mar 2026

The petitioner, P. Velusamy, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the 4th respondent (Tahsildar) to remove encroachment on Periyasamy Te...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Encroachment Case Due to Procedural Violation — Converts Section 6 Final Notice into Section 7 Show Cause Notice Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. Court Held That Authorities Must Follow Mandatory Procedure of Issuing Show Cause Notice Before Final Eviction Notice.

17 Mar 2026

The petitioner, A. Ganaprakasam, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging a final...

High Court

Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Challenging Interdepartmental Communication for Encroachment Removal, Grants Liberty to Approach District Collector. Petitioner directed to seek remedy before District Collector if action contrary to earlier order under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act.

17 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Erumapalayam Kongu Nagar Samuga represented by its President S. Perumal @ Raja, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constit...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Encroachment Removal Notice as Re-litigation. Petitioner failed to establish legal right over public street; court directed eviction within four weeks under Section 128 of Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998.

19 Jan 2026

The present writ petition was filed by M.Annamalai challenging a final notice dated 19.09.2025 issued under Section 128(1)(b)(2) of the Tamil Nadu Urb...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Challenging Encroachment Notice Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Disputed Facts Regarding Land Ownership Cannot Be Adjudicated Under Article 226; Petitioner Directed to Appeal Under Section 10 of Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905.

12 Jan 2026

The petitioner, R.Selvi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging an order dated ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of Writ Petition (L) No. 30829 of 2024. The petition involved multiple parties including the State of Maharashtra and several private respondents.

8 May 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Waqf Tribunal Order Upholding Encroachment Removal — Land Held to be Waqf Property Based on Revenue Records and Survey Report. The court found no jurisdictional error or perversity in the concurrent findings of the CEO and Waqf Tribunal under Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995.

10 Jun 2021

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the applicants (original applicants) challenging an order dated 21/10/2009 passed by the Chief...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Appointment of Commissioner in Civil Suit — Appointment Would Amount to Calling Evidence at Instance of Court. The court held that under Order 26 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, a Commissioner cannot be appointed to gather evidence for a party; the parties must prove their own case.

27 Aug 2014

The petitioners challenged an order passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division, Panaji, in Regular Civil Suit No. 11/2007 dated 03.08.2013, whereby an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application as Not Maintainable in Civil Suit for Injunction — Order Refusing Temporary Injunction Is Appealable Under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC. Revision Under Section 115 CPC Is Not Maintainable When an Alternative Remedy of Appeal Exists.

31 Jul 2013

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants, Babybai w/o Skharam Pardeshi and Madansingh s/o Dharamsingh Pardeshi, against the ...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)