Search Results for "Domestic enquiry not perverse"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Domestic enquiry not perverse"

327 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 327 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Management's Writ Petition in Industrial Dispute Case, Upholding Order Refusing to Recall Witness. Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Not Intended for Routine Recall to Fill Lacunae; Repeated Applications After Enquiry Held Proper Amount to Abuse of Process.

7 Feb 2020

The case arose from an industrial dispute where the respondent workman had challenged his dismissal from service. The petitioner, a company, had termi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employee in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Oral Termination by Management Set Aside as Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

25 Jun 2019

The petitioner, Suraj Pressings Pvt. Limited, challenged the judgment of the Labour Court dated 04/01/2014, which allowed Complaint (ULP) No.50/2006 f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order in Succession Act Case — Power of Attorney Holder Can File Appeal Under Section 384 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. The Court held that the word 'person' in Section 384 includes a power of attorney holder, and the appeal filed by such holder is maintainable.

12 Feb 2016

The petitioner, Mr. Tomas Shamson De Souza, through his power of attorney holder Mr. Teofilo Dias, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay a...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Tribunal Awards in Labour Disputes — Upholds Reinstatement of Workmen with Back Wages for Termination Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that termination of workmen without complying with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal and that the Industrial Tribunal's discretion to grant reinstatement with back wages under Section 11A was properly exercised.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves four writ petitions filed by two companies, M/s. Kundil Alloys Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Kundil Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd., challenging se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Husband's Maintenance Claim Under Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act — Able-bodied Qualified Husband Not Entitled to Interim Maintenance from Wife. Court holds that a husband who is well-qualified and capable of securing employment cannot claim maintenance from his wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, as the provision is intended to prevent vagrancy and destitution, not to enable an able-bodied spouse to avoid work.

13 Nov 2025

The petitioner wife challenged an order of the Family Court, Nagpur, dated 17.07.2025, which directed her to pay interim maintenance of Rs.5,000 per m...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal of Judicial Officer Challenging Compulsory Retirement — Delay Condoned but No Grounds to Interfere with Penalty. The Division Bench upheld the order of compulsory retirement imposed on a Civil Judge (Sr. Dvn.) for misconduct, finding no infirmity in the disciplinary proceedings or the quantum of punishment.

19 Aug 2025

The appellant, Sri K.M. Gangadhar, a judicial officer who joined as a Civil Judge (Jr. Dvn.) in February 1995 and was promoted to Civil Judge (Sr. Dvn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition Under Article 227, Quashes Husband's Interim Maintenance Order Under Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act. Able-bodied Qualified Husband Not Entitled to Maintenance from Wife as He Can Maintain Himself.

13 Nov 2025

The petitioner wife challenged an order of the Family Court, Nagpur, dated 17.07.2025, which directed her to pay interim maintenance of Rs.5,000 per m...

31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)