Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1524 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1524 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Arbitration Dispute Over Interest and Contract Interpretation. The Court held that arbitral tribunals have the power to award compound interest under Section 31(7) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and that a Memorandum of Understanding merged into an Implementation Agreement for arbitration purposes based on contractual terms.

7 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court addressed two civil appeals arising from a common judgment of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in an arbitration dispute between U...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 10475 OF 2011

7 Mar 2012

The case involved a partnership firm (Petitioner) engaged in manufacturing soft gelatin pharmaceutical products, and a US corporation (Respondent No.1...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of arbitrator in joint development dispute after earlier award rejected specific performance. The court considers whether the claim for damages is barred by res judicata, following the Supreme Court's direction that such issue is for the arbitral tribunal.

29 Jul 2022

Background: The dispute arose out of a series of joint development agreements entered into between the petitioners (developers) and the father of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Enforcement of Arbitral Interim Order Under Section 27 of Arbitration Act. Section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is limited to court assistance in taking evidence and does not extend to implementation of arbitral directions; remedy lies under Section 17 or Section 9.

20 Jul 2012

The case involves a dispute between United Spirits Limited (Petitioner) and Delta Distilleries Limited (Respondent No.1) arising from a bottling agree...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute. Court holds that an arbitral award granting refund of mobilization advance and damages for breach of contract does not warrant interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

19 May 2026

The petitioner, Hind Offshore Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act Against Arbitrator's Order Rejecting Interim Relief — Holds That Arbitrator Must Consider Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss Before Refusing Interim Injunction.

12 Oct 2012

The appellant, Spice Digital Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated 16...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Foreign Award Enforcement. Court holds that under the amended Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, only the High Court having jurisdiction over the subject matter of the award can entertain interim measures, not any court where assets are located.

9 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Trammo DMCC, a company incorporated in the UAE, obtained a foreign arbitral award against the respondent, Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Appeal Against Order Refusing Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Referred to Sole Arbitrator. The Court held that the existence of an arbitration agreement is a jurisdictional fact and once prima facie satisfied, the court must appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Sep 2025

The appellant, Mahindra Defence Systems Limited, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Termination of Arbitral Tribunal Mandate Due to Inordinate Delay in Proceedings — Appoints Retired Judge as Sole Arbitrator Under Sections 14 and 15 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that failure of the arbitral tribunal to commence hearings for over seven years constituted failure to act without undue delay, justifying termination of mandate and substitution of arbitrator.

20 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Simplex Infrastructures Limited, filed an arbitration petition under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Set Aside for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's rejection of the counterclaim without considering evidence and without granting an opportunity to be heard amounted to a patent illegality and breach of natural justice.

4 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Marine Electricals (India) Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside an arbi...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)