Search Results for "2016 Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "2016 Rules"

6463 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6463 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Upholding CLB's Condonation of Delay in Share Transmission Registration. Core Issue Revolves Around Interpretation of Section 58(3) of Companies Act, 2013 and the CLB's Inherent Powers to Apply Limitation Act Provisions.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute centered on the condonation of a 249-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 before the Company Law B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order in KVAT Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice — Assessee Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Third Party. Section 39(1) Reassessment Set Aside as Assessing Authority Relied on Ex-Parte Statements Without Providing Opportunity to Rebut.

10 Nov 2016

The petitioner, M/s. TTP Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a registered company represented by its Director Sri. M. Devarajaiah, filed writ petitions under Arti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator's Mandate for Failure to Pass Award Within Statutory Time Limit Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act. Court Appoints Substitute Arbitrator After Original Arbitrator Failed to Conclude Proceedings Despite Multiple Extensions.

16 Jun 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Madhav Structural Engineers Limited, filed a petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking term...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Estate Officer’s Jurisdiction Under PP Act Against SARFAESI Possession. Asset Reconstruction Company Asserts SARFAESI Act Overrides PP Act, Requiring Landlord to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal.

24 Aug 2016

The writ petitioner, an Asset Reconstruction Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and registered under the SARFAESI Act, challenged the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MPID Act Appeal for Return of Seized Property to Accused Pending Trial — Property Not Proceeds of Crime Under MPID Act. Court holds that Section 3 of MPID Act does not authorize continued retention of property not linked to deposits, and directs release of vehicle and cash to appellant subject to conditions.

30 Nov 2017

The Bombay High Court allowed Criminal Appeal No. 813 of 2016 filed by Suresh Raju Shetty, challenging an order of the Designated Court under the Maha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Appointees in Drug Inspector Selection Case, Reversing High Court's Quashing of Appointments. The Court found no arbitrariness or illegality in the recast eligibility criteria, selection committee composition, or viva-voce marks allocation under the Jammu and Kashmir Subordinate Services Recruitment Rules, 1992, and reinstated the 2009 appointments.

28 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from the selection process conducted on 8 September 2009 for appointing drug inspectors in Jammu and Kashmir, resulting in the appoi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Head Constables in Promotion Dispute — Rules 2010 Notified After Vacancy Cannot Deny Promotion. Educational Qualification for Promotion to ASI-Executive Must Be Possessed at Time of Promotion, Not Initial Appointment, Under 2008 Rules and Standing Order.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute among Head Constables of the Andaman & Nicobar Police Department regarding promotion to the post of Assistant Sub-Inspecto...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Plaintiff to Bear Costs of Discharge and Storage of Arrested Cargo in Admiralty Suit. The court held that a party who secures an order of arrest of cargo cannot insist that the shipowner bear the costs of discharging and storing the cargo, as the shipowner is not a party to the arrest and the cargo is in custodia legis.

27 Jun 2016

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the owner of the vessel m.v. Ocean 39 (the ship interests) seeking directions against the plaintiff, Cup...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Hawking Activities on Footpaths in Nariman Point and Churchgate Areas. Court Holds That Hawking Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(g) Subject to Reasonable Restrictions, and That Municipal Authorities Have Discretion to Designate Hawking Zones.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, a group of residents and welfare associations from Nariman Point and Churchgate areas in Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 2987 OF 2018

3 Jun 2019

The judgment, rendered on 3 June 2019 by Justice G.S. Kulkarni of the Bombay High Court, was a writ petition concerning a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme o...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)