Search Results for "subsisting lease"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "subsisting lease"

425 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 425 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Orders of In-charge Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Under SARFAESI Act in Challenge to Jurisdiction. Court Examines Whether In-charge Officer Could Validly Pass Orders Under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Citing De-Facto Doctrine.

28 Oct 2015

The writ petitions, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenged orders passed by the In-charge Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mum...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Issues Judgment on Official Trustee's Petition Against MHADA Notice and Redevelopment Approvals — Matter Concerns Temple Property and Involves Heritage and Coastal Zone Regulations. The petition seeks setting aside of notice under Section 95-A of MHADA Act, building plans, and TDR certificate, while developer relies on Memorandum of Understanding and court orders.

6 Mar 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Aurangabad Hears Letters Patent Appeal Against Dismissal of Review in Kulkarni Watan Land Regrant Case. Decides on Rights of Purchaser Versus Successors of Original Watandar Under Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act, 1950.

10 Jan 2019

The dispute involved lands bearing Survey Nos. 135 and 144 at Jamda, Jalgaon, originally held as Kulkarni Watan. In 1944, the vendor Ramchandra Tembul...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Writ Petition Challenging Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal’s Restoration Order. Tenant’s Application Under Section 32G for Price Fixation Could Not Be Converted into a Proceeding for Restoration of Possession, and Earlier Section 33B Proceeding Already Restored Part of the Land.

27 Jun 2012

The dispute involved a tenant’s application under Section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, for fixation of the purchase p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Res Judicata Case — High Court Erred in Dismissing Second Appeal Without Considering Substantial Question of Law. The suit for declaration of title and possession was not barred by res judicata as the earlier suit did not adjudicate the rights of co-defendants.

8 Jul 2024

The plaintiff-appellant, Har Narayan Tewari, filed Title Suit No.9/89 for declaration of title and possession over 0.30 acres of land (0.12 acres of P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision Against Concurrent Eviction Decrees for Rent Default and Denial of Title Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenant's Irregular Rent Payments and Denial of Landlord's Title Justify Eviction Despite Absence of Formal Demand Notice.

20 Dec 2024

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the tenant (Dilip Jasaramji Mali) challenging the concurrent eviction decrees passed by the Sm...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Case on Appointment of Advocate as Commissioner. The Court held that a District Magistrate or Chief Metropolitan Magistrate can appoint an advocate to take possession of secured assets under Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as an advocate is considered an officer of the court subordinate to the Magistrate.

25 Feb 2022

The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Tenancy Dispute, Upholding Protected Tenant's Ownership Rights. Oral Surrender of Protected Tenancy Rights Held Invalid Under Section 19 of Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, and Occupancy Rights Granted in 1982 Annulled as Ownership Had Already Vested in Protected Tenant Under Section 38-E from 1973.

1 Oct 2021

The dispute concerned conflicting claims over agricultural land between the legal heirs of a purchaser and a protected tenant. The purchaser's predece...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision in Kerala Private Forests Vesting Case — Certificate of Purchase Under Land Reforms Act is Conclusive Proof of Title and Possession. The Court held that land under personal cultivation with a certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 is exempt from vesting under Section 3(2) of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971.

22 Jan 2019

The State of Kerala appealed against the High Court's judgment allowing the respondent's claim that his land was not a private forest and thus exempt ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.

24 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)