Search Results for "specific pleading"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "specific pleading"

1715 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1715 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition in Katepurna Morna Project — Market Value Determined at Rs. 1,00,000 per Acre with Additional Statutory Benefits. The court relied on comparable sales and potential value of agricultural land near urban area to fix compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

27 Sep 2022

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Reference Court in Land Acquisition Case No. 183 of 2000, concerning the acquisiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Land Acquisition Case for Agricultural Land — Applies Multiplier Method and Considers Potential for Non-Agricultural Use. Court holds that potential value of land for non-agricultural use must be considered and multiplier method is appropriate for determining market value under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

27 Sep 2022

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the 3rd Ad-hoc Additional District Judge, Akola, in Land Acquisition Case No. 53 of 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Claimants' Appeal in Part and Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value of Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare Upheld with Reduced Deduction for Small Landholders. Court Relies on Precedent for Same Village and Modifies Development Charges Deduction from 30% to 20% for Landholders with Less Than 2 Hectares.

27 Sep 2022

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for the Katepurna Morna Project in...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds 1/3rd Share to Plaintiff. Daughter of Predeceased Daughter Entitled to Share Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

25 Jul 2025

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the concurrent judgment and decree of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Dispute Over Termination of a Medical Practitioner — Finds Hospital's Termination Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court Modified Back Wages to 50% for the Period from Termination to Labour Court Award and Full Back Wages Thereafter.

5 Apr 2011

The case involves a dispute between N.M. Wadia Charitable Trust Hospital, Solapur (appellant) and Dr. Ashok Vyankatesh Apte (respondent), a full-time ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint in NI Act Case for Lack of Vicarious Liability — Petitioner Not a Director or Signatory. Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 requires specific averments of role and consent for vicarious liability of company officers.

19 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Sidharth Chauhan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Civil Suit for Possession — Order IX Rule 13 CPC Application Held Maintainable Despite Decree Under Order VIII Rule 5(2) or Rule 10. The Court held that an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC is maintainable to set aside an ex parte decree passed under Order VIII Rule 5(2) or Rule 10 CPC, as the decree is still ex parte and the defendant can show sufficient cause for non-appearance.

10 Aug 2005

The case arises from Regular Civil Suit No.52 of 1992 filed by the respondent (plaintiff) against the petitioners (defendants) for possession of suit ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Remands Industrial Dispute to Industrial Court for Fresh Adjudication on Jurisdictional Issue of Workman Status. The Industrial Court failed to frame an issue on whether the respondent was a workman under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which is a jurisdictional prerequisite, leading to the impugned order being set aside.

14 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Deogiri Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 12.02.2014 of the Industrial Court in Complaint (ULP) No.1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Partition Suit in Joint Hindu Family Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court and First Appellate Court Decrees. The court held that the plaintiff proved the existence of joint family business and properties, and the suit was not barred by limitation or res judicata.

3 May 2016

The case involves a dispute over partition of Joint Hindu Family properties. The plaintiff, Premsukh, filed a suit for partition and separate possessi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action in Mahim Constituency Dispute. Failure to disclose chargesheets in Form 26 affidavit does not constitute corrupt practice under Section 100(1)(b) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, as the alleged non-disclosure did not materially affect the election result.

7 Apr 2026

The case involves an Interim Application filed by Mahesh Baliram Sawant, the returned candidate from the Mahim Constituency in the 15th Maharashtra Le...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)