Search Results for "implied bar"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "implied bar"

886 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 886 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Refusal to Set Aside Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court Holds That Challenge to Arbitral Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy Must Be Based on Clear Violation of Law or Contract, Not Mere Erroneous Application of Law.

22 Dec 2017

The appellant, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), filed a Commercial Appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Overrules Res Judicata Objection in Admiralty Limitation Suit; Prior Withdrawal of Application Before Chinese Court Does Not Bar Fresh Suit Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

8 Jan 2016

The dispute arose from a voyage of the vessel M.V. YURIY ARSHENEVSKIY, owned by Murmansk Shipping Company, a Russian entity, which was chartered to ca...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding-Up Order in Bond Default Case; Upholds Adverse Remarks Against Directors for Fund Diversion. Company Found Unable to Pay Debts and Substratum Lost, Justifying Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and 433(f) of Companies Act, 1956.

23 Apr 2014

The appeal arose from a winding-up order passed by the learned company Judge against Zenith Infotech Limited (the appellant) in a petition filed by Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging Compulsory Purchase Order Under Income Tax Act. Suit Seeking Declaration That Compulsory Purchase Order Stood Abrogated Was Barred by Section 269-UN and Section 293 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Which Exclude Civil Court Jurisdiction.

25 Apr 2025

The appeal was filed against the order dated 7th April 2014 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the plaintiff's suit ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Restrains Defendant from Using Deceptively Similar Mark 'Shubhlaxmi Chiwda Mahalaxmi'. The Court modified the interim injunction to allow the defendant to use 'Shubhlaxmi Chiwda' with a blue background, subject to an undertaking, while restraining the use of 'Mahalaxmi'.

3 Sep 2024

The present Commercial Appeal from Order was filed by the appellant (original defendant) challenging the judgment and order dated 17th February 2023 p...

High Court

Judicial Scrutiny of RBI's Supersession of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank's Board. Balance between Constitutional mandates and banking regulations reaffirmed.

18 Nov 2024

The Bombay High Court assessed the legality of the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) supersession of the Board of Directors of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Challenge as Barred by Limitation — Section 4 of Limitation Act Does Not Extend 30-Day Condonable Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration Act When It Expires During Court Vacation. The Court held that Section 4 of the Limitation Act applies only to the 3-month prescribed period, not to the 30-day condonable period under the proviso to Section 34(3), and Section 10 of the General Clauses Act is inapplicable.

1 Jan 2025

The case involves an appeal by My Preferred Trans Formation & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and another against M/s Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd. arising fro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — CMD's Ineligibility to Act as Arbitrator Renders Appointment Void Ab Initio. Express Agreement in Writing Under Section 12(5) Proviso Must Be Post-Dispute and Cannot Be Inferred from Pre-Dispute Conduct.

10 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Bharat Broadband Network Limited (BBNL) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had rejecte...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes MSEFC Award for Lack of Jurisdiction Over Buyer Not Registered Under MSMED Act. Petitioner's Failure to File Objections Under Section 18(3) Does Not Confer Jurisdiction on Council When Buyer Is Not a 'Supplier' Under Section 2(n) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.

23 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Dodal Electro Instruments, a proprietorship concern based in Pune, engaged in the manufacture and supply of electrical instruments, en...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Licensors in Leave and Licence Disputes Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that termination of licence agreements and recovery of possession are arbitrable disputes warranting interim protection to prevent irretrievable injustice.

20 Aug 2022

The judgment concerns three arbitration petitions filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by licensors seeking interim me...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)